Tips
May 29, 2019 14:56
According to Maezawa’s answer, “There’s no such thing as a going rate. Women can name the amount they want regardless of their class, and men can pay whatever they can afford to pay that woman, regardless of her class.”
This content is machine-translated.
If that’s the case, though, isn’t it contradictory that staff assign classes based on the standard that “the prettier the woman, the higher her class and the higher her setup fee,” according to their objective evaluation?
I think this is why men continue to believe that “the amount is determined by the woman’s class.”
It feels like the women’s true feelings (the amount they want, regardless of class), the men’s true feelings (wanting to determine the amount based on class = appearance), the staff’s true feelings (the amount should be decided regardless of class), and the club’s official stance (the prettier the woman, the higher the amount; the less attractive she is, the lower it is) are completely out of sync.
Isn’t that why the debate over class assignments never seems to end?
If so, why not determine a woman’s class from the amount she declares she wants from the outset, rather than through an objective evaluation of her appearance?
If it’s self-declared, then whether the amount is too high or she receives no offers as a result is her own responsibility. Men wouldn’t have anything to complain about, and if they knew the requested amount in advance, there would be no more trouble from finding out after meeting that the amount didn’t match. It would also save the staff the trouble of reviewing class assignments, wouldn’t it?
