Reading through the questions, I’m stunned by things like “Let me do it raw,” “Four hours or more (but the allowance stays the same),” and “Let me go for round two.” Is this really what papa-katsu (compensated dating in Japan) is like these days? Is it cheaper and more demanding than a call girl? What’s in it for the mistress?

Maezawa here. Are you saying you want the wording changed slightly and presented from a woman’s perspective? It does feel like you’re desperately trying to put it down somehow. For example, imagine a woman who just got married saying, “My husband…” “He wants to do it without protection” → Isn’t that normal if you’re trying to have children? “He wants it to last over four hours” → That’s quite a husband you have. “He wants to go for a second round” → Isn’t that about right? You like him, don’t you? “Is this cheaper and more demanding than a delivery-based escort service?” → Isn’t that a strange comparison? You’re talking about your husband, aren’t you? Wait, have you worked in that industry? Is that the kind of thing you mean? Universe Club isn’t marriage, but if both people are happy with the arrangement, there’s nothing wrong with it. I think it would be great if people could meet someone they can enjoy a wonderful time with, just as they would with a romantic partner. There’s no need to force comparisons with the adult entertainment industry. I think people who understand the good points already recognize them. Once you actually register and meet a good man, I think you’ll see that there are many benefits. (Of course, it’s not all positive, so you should think it through carefully—that’s something we’re supposed to discuss during the interview.)