I'm a male member.

Question

I wanted to ask because something in Mr. Maezawa's answer to another question struck me as odd. Regarding the types, Mr. Maezawa says that if a woman ends up going on dates with four men and having an adult relationship (intimate) with two of them—“50% of the time”—that makes her a C type, while if it's “50% for each man she dates,” she is made an A type. Is that the club's common understanding? (Even if staff are free to answer questions in the Q&A box, each individual staff member shouldn't be free to interpret the types however they want, so there must be a common understanding—or it would be a problem if there weren't one.) According to Mr. Maezawa's interpretation, if a woman is classified as a C type and then receives consecutive offers from men she finds physically unacceptable, she would be treated as a fraud unless she had an intimate relationship with half of them. That seems terribly harsh to me. I had understood that a woman considers it from the very first day depending on the man—in other words, that “50% for each man she dates” is what makes someone a C type. I don't see what the problem with that is, so am I mistaken? I would like to hear an answer from someone other than Mr. Maezawa. (I'm sorry, but his answers are always off the mark.)

Answer 1

I’ll answer this one too, as Maezawa. Since another staff member has already responded, I suppose it’s okay for me to answer now as well. Apparently, with Dating Type C, the chance of accepting an ongoing relationship after dinner is 50% for each man she dates, so this is good news for women who are thinking of applying from now on. Even among women classified as Dating Type A, many say they might consider continuing the relationship if the man is in his twenties, handsome, wealthy, and kind. So from now on, it seems women can confidently and safely answer, “I’m Dating Type C.” For each man, there are only two choices: accept or decline. Since it’s a two-way choice, either one comes out to 50%. Even if a woman goes on dates with four men and declines all four after dinner, that isn’t Dating Type fraud. It simply means that, after judging each date individually, things happened to turn out that way. Even if she dates ten men and declines all ten, the result is still based on a 50% judgment for each man, so there’s nothing wrong with calling herself Dating Type C. She can confidently answer, “I’m Dating Type C,” and that should be fine. Even if the club points out in the feedback that she has never continued seeing anyone after dinner, she can just say: “Isn’t it 50% for each individual date?” Apparently, that should still be enough for her to remain Dating Type C. Even if a man says something, she can respond: “The club told me that if I make the decision individually for each man and it’s 50%, that qualifies as Type C.” That should do the trick. It seems I may have conducted interviews from the men’s perspective a little too much. I suppose I should have been more on the women’s side. That said, with my approach, I explain the dating types in detail to the women. I’ve interviewed more than 600 women, and I’ve never received a complaint about the dating types. Of course, it’s possible that some kind men simply let it slide because they thought, “Maezawa is working hard too.” But I tend to be fairly strict when explaining things, so perhaps there’s less of a mismatch. If the male members themselves agree that judging things at 50% for each man qualifies as Dating Type C, then the club probably won’t get angry complaints from the men anymore. Maybe that would make everyone happy after all. And yet, the Earth keeps turning...

I'm a male member.

1 answers

🏆 Select as Best Answer

✉️ Set a password

I'm a male member.

1 answers

Related Questions

🏆 Select as Best Answer

✉️ Set a password