Are the comments staff write on each female member’s profile based on their honest impressions from actually seeing her appearance and behavior, or are they exaggerated? (I mean both the good and bad points...)\r

I’m Taro, a male member. I don’t think the profiles are exaggerated just to attract more offers. My impression is that the staff write them based on how they felt during the interview. You can usually tell from the wording whether the interview didn’t really click and they didn’t find much common ground, or whether they talked at length and really connected. Some staff get overly invested and write things that are almost like fantasies, but once you get used to it, you learn to take those descriptions with a grain of salt. Male members who haven’t learned to do that might occasionally run into trouble. You can check someone’s appearance in their photos and videos, so I don’t think it’s common to find that they look completely different in person. There was one case where the photos and video were so overexposed that you couldn’t make out her features, and when we met, she had a very pronounced, almost foreign-looking overbite. Some people really like that look, but it was a shame that the photos didn’t make it clear. Still, I think that was a rare case.

I’m Date◎Yume, a male member. I haven’t actually met that many people, but although some photos are enhanced or touched up a little, I feel they’re generally accurate. There was one person I met whose photos were particularly flattering. I complimented the staff, saying, “She’s really good at taking photos and making herself look great.”（笑)

Maezawa from the president’s office will answer this as well. > Are the comments that staff write on each female member’s profile based on their honest impressions after actually seeing her appearance and behavior? I believe they write about what they genuinely noticed. So, if a staff member feels during the interview that a woman isn’t very enjoyable to talk to, they probably won’t write many positive things about her. And if she treats the interviewer dismissively or gives rude answers, that naturally gets conveyed to the staff, too. It may result in something like: “We absolutely won’t introduce this woman.” (She’ll still appear on the list, so don’t worry.) And if a man inquires about her, they’ll probably tell him that she had a bad attitude. So, if you thought, “I became interested and made an offer because the staff praised her so highly in her profile,” then that means the staff genuinely felt that way when they interviewed her. > I’m worried that men will be disappointed when they see me in person (crying). I’m not particularly beautiful or anything… When it comes to appearance, men can tell from the photos, so profiles usually don’t say much about whether someone is beautiful or not. Even if they do, men don’t really focus on that. I think what they care about is mainly how different she looks in person compared with her photos. The things staff praise are usually qualities that can’t be seen from photos. So if a man were to be disappointed after meeting her, I imagine it would be in cases where she seemed like a really nice person when meeting the staff, but lets her true personality show when meeting men. Though I don’t think there are many women like that. (There probably are a few.)

I’m Kazu, a male member. It depends on the staff member, but I don’t think they’re exaggerating. My impression is that they’re trying to highlight and compliment each woman’s good qualities. They rarely write anything negative.