I believe the male-to-female feedback used to be rated on a 10-point scale, but when I checked earlier, it had been changed to a five-point scale from -2 to 2.

I’m Maezawa from the CEO’s office, and I’ll answer this as well. > I thought the ratings used to be on a 10-point scale. I thought they had always been on a 5-point scale. Was there ever a period when they used 10 points? > It’s confusing. Do you mean it’s confusing for the staff? (I can’t imagine there are any members who can see both the men’s and women’s ratings.) I don’t really understand why a member would find it confusing. Was the survey rating posted somewhere? I thought only the staff could see it. Or perhaps this question came from an exchange like this: A male member threatens a woman he made an offer to, saying, “You’d better give me a high rating. You know what I mean.” Then he says, “Make my rating +2, okay?” “But +2 would be a bad rating. Is that really okay?” “What? +2 is the highest rating, isn’t it?” “No, the highest rating is +10.” If that’s the context, it’s kind of scary… ＞＜ Incidentally, I have a pretty good idea why +10 came up here instead of +5（笑）

I’m the male member known as “Kantō-rei’s Tobita University graduate, idiot lecher, SS pinky-sized paper airplane”—a name bestowed by Date◎Yume. When it comes to dating between men and women: It’s probably best to give male members only positive ratings. If the feedback is negative, they’ll just let it go in one ear and out the other without any intention of taking it seriously, and it’ll only leave a bad impression… Basically, it’s safest to report only objective facts. If negative feedback comes from a woman, though, they’ll listen much more seriously—five times as attentively as they would to a man’s feedback, no, maybe even a hundred times more sympathetically. So perhaps male members only need ratings of 4 or 5… If a man gives someone a 1 or 2, everyone at the branch will take notice, label him someone to watch, and continue treating him like a person to handle with extreme caution. Any careful treatment he receives isn’t because he’s important or deserving of special consideration—it’s simply because they don’t want him making unreasonable complaints…