Tips Aug 12, 2019 11:27

I’m Mack, the column writer.

This content is machine-translated.
I was shocked to hear that, in response to the question posted at 15:20 on August 11, 2019, you said that sharing information about registered women is not permitted, whether between members or with non-members. In my first article, published on December 8, 2017 (Love Vaccine, Episode 1: “The Girl Who Wants to Be Choked”), I wrote: “Since a dating club’s role is to provide an opportunity for the initial meeting, it is not a violation of the rules to introduce a girl to another member after one of the members has gone on a date with her, provided that the girl agrees.” From the time that article was published until now, I have never received a warning from Universe, so I believed my understanding was correct. If, as Mr. Maezawa says, this is grounds for “forced termination of membership,” then I feel responsible as the person who published that information. I believe many members read my column and thought it was okay. In fact, I also think the column management staff, from that time until now, bear significant responsibility. Furthermore, it seems to me that President Kida himself should appear and explain why my article was left unaddressed. What do you think? I hope Mr. Maezawa will retract his earlier statement. If that is not possible, however, I regret to say that I would prefer to withdraw voluntarily before being subjected to the dishonorable and unwanted punishment of forced termination of membership.
👤 Asked by Guest 👤GenderNot stated 🎂 Not stated 👑 Not stated
💗 Likes 0 👁️ Views 99 💬 Answers 2
🔖 ID h*mA7-00000 🎯 Looking for answers from Anyone

1 answers

前澤(スタッフ)
前澤(スタッフ) Male Column Send a reverse offer to this responder
🏅 あなたの味方
お役に立てれば幸いです。
Age: Private 👨 Male Universe staff
Maezawa from the President’s Office here. First, I’m sorry for startling you by writing that I would personally initiate the process for your forced removal from the club. I hereby retract that statement. There are various possible disciplinary measures for violations of the rules, and it does not necessarily mean that someone will be forcibly removed from the club. We hear the circumstances, review the details internally, and then decide what action to take. Of course, there are violations—such as drunk driving, which is subject to criminal penalties—where the facts alone warrant forced removal, even without hearing the person’s explanation. Regarding this particular matter, I personally feel that intentionally doing it while knowing it violated the rules would warrant forced removal. However, if you genuinely didn’t know it was against the rules, I believe there is room for leniency. Given the circumstances, my impression is that this may result in a severe warning this time—with different consequences if it happens again—but I’ll refrain from making a definitive statement here, in case I’m mistaken again. As for this matter, I believe it falls under the following prohibited act in our rules: “4. Providing information learned through this club to a third party, including female members.” https://universe-club.jp/men/membershippolicy/ If you believe this does not apply in this case, I’d appreciate it if you could explain why.
(3 replies left)