In a message from the staff, I was told that the person had a ★★★★★ rating, so I was really looking forward to meeting him.

> So, I feel like the system has ended up favoring male and female members who go on more dates, resulting in more five-star ratings. I think that’s probably the case. So they’re not all that reliable. For men in particular, the system only started last year, so it’s even less useful as a reference. I haven’t made a new offer in over a year—excluding reverse offers—since before the rating system began, so I’m probably at three stars. If both parties are continuing a successful relationship and have no need to make or accept new offers, they may never reach five stars.

The star rating is determined by women’s feedback. There isn’t enough information to say for sure, but perhaps the man offered a good allowance? I think some women may give a high rating as long as the allowance is good, even if he isn’t particularly well-groomed or takes them to a hotel without saying anything first. Likewise, even women who feel the way you do might not give the lowest possible rating in their feedback if the allowance was good. That would result in a man having a few high ratings and many average ones, keeping his overall star rating high. In fact, it only takes about four top ratings to reach five stars. (You need a score of +7 or higher for five stars, and each review can change the score by anywhere from +2 to -2.) Incidentally, I recently met a rather rude woman who had five stars. But if a man gets to sleep with a beautiful woman with a very large bust and a slim waist that same day, there are certainly men who would still give her a high rating. I mean, I did end up sleeping with her too, so giving her the lowest rating felt a bit much, and I gave her an average rating instead lol. So, all things considered, I feel like the system has ended up favoring five-star ratings for both male and female members who have been on a lot of dates.

Universe is a business, so I think it’s best to take their star ratings and staff comments with a grain of salt—maybe discount them by around 40%. On the other hand, female members are more often even better in person than they look in photos or videos, aren’t they? That shows Universe doesn’t heavily edit its photos, which I really appreciate about the company’s approach. Apparently, other clubs heavily edit their photos and even list the allowance they’re looking for.

The comment saying he was “very calm, well-groomed, humble, and kind” may have been based on the interview, but the star rating is an evaluation from his dating partner. I often hear women talk about men who take them to a hotel without discussing either the allowance or the fact that they would be going to a hotel, so there may be quite a few men like that. If that’s common, it’s possible that women are using that as part of their criteria when leaving ratings. That said, if you felt the questioner lacked sincerity, I think it’s fine to simply leave an unfavorable review. As an aside, I also think that kind of behavior from a man lacks sincerity.