I’m a male member.

Maezawa here to answer. > To be honest, I don’t feel that one staff member’s criteria for clearing Type C—“there might even be an adult relationship on the first date if he’s a handsome, high-income man in his 20s”—represents the average profile of your male members (lol). I’m sorry—the way I worded it was poor, and it seems I didn’t get my point across clearly. Type A means: “I’m looking for dates involving tea or a meal. I’m not looking for a relationship that includes physical intimacy.” So these women are looking for dinner only (no intimacy). That said, there are also women who think: “If the man is in his 20s, handsome, wealthy, and kind, there might possibly be an adult relationship.” That’s all I meant. I’m talking specifically about Type A women. As for the male member who asked the question, his view of Type C was that it meant “50% for each man she dates.” Since the staff shared the same understanding, we were able to confirm the common interpretation that Type C means 50% for each man she dates. Therefore, I feel that the request— “I hope the staff can establish a firm shared understanding of how the relationship types should be interpreted.” —has been fulfilled. However, with that shared understanding, wouldn’t someone who is actually Type B or Type A be able to call herself Type C without anyone saying anything? After all, if you’re supposed to think of it as a 50% chance with each person she dates… That was all I was saying.