Why is it that the more possessive male members are, the more likely they are to make offers to other women or suddenly cut you off?
This content is machine-translated.
I’ve always wondered about this, but I feel like there’s an almost universal rule that the men who say things like, “I want you to look only at me, so I want you to quit the club,” or “I want to see you once a week (though the allowance is low, lol),” are the very ones who end up being unfaithful to that woman themselves.
Why is that, exactly?
On the other hand, men who:
- Don’t pry into every detail of your club activities or try to control you
- Give you a generous allowance
- Always give you the agreed amount, even in months when you meet fewer times than usual
- Add extra to the allowance for birthdays and special events
seem more likely to be the ones who maintain long-term arrangements.
If they want women to be faithful to them, why can’t they simply think about why women join dating clubs and respond to what they’re looking for?
Or does “I want you to look only at me” mean that these men don’t actually like the woman, but are simply vulgar people whose only concern is benefiting themselves?
I’m Taro, a male member.
That question is pretty painful. It seems Marika has already seen right through it, though. After the phrase “on the other hand,” the repeated mention of money three times makes me lose any desire to give a serious answer.
Anyway, I’ve said what I wanted to say, so I’ll answer the first part seriously. The answer is simple: basically, men like that are self-centered. That explains everything, doesn’t it?
I think the person asking the question is the same type, but people of this type don’t get along with one another. Too bad.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
I’m Kamihikoki, a male member.
Since their words and actions show no consideration for the other person, I think they’d have no problem with betraying them either.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
Good evening~
As always, thanks for your hard work.
If it’s really something everyone can relate to that much, you’d make more money uploading a relatable video to YouTube than by constantly complaining about it here.
That is, of course, assuming enough people relate to it and watch it.
Marika
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
I’m Date◎Yume, a male member.
> So why is that, exactly?
I think it’s because both sides want the other person to be someone who suits their own needs.
Men want to stay close to their dating partner without putting too much strain on their wallet, while women want to receive a generous allowance without being tied down too much.
But then the man meets another woman and thinks, “The allowance is the same, but maybe I like this one better?”
And the woman thinks, “He’s so stingy with the allowance, and he’s dishonest too!”
I suppose that’s how it goes.
In the end, both sides are dating while constantly pushing each other’s limits, so they probably just have to compromise to some extent（笑）
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
Maezawa from the CEO’s office here—I’ll answer as well.
Some people who say, “I want you to look only at me,” also mean, “I’ll look only at you,” so I don’t think they’re all insincere.
Even so, wanting someone all to yourself is selfish.
They’re probably the type who puts themselves first, so I can imagine them cutting someone off over the slightest thing without giving any thought to the other person.
In that sense, I think the questioner’s assessment is pretty much on point.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
