I’m Seattle, a male member.
I see.
If I notice any typos, I’ll report them via LINE instead of leaving them uncorrected for a while.
Hopefully, that’ll help reduce them, even if only a little.
I’m a male member of UC and a member of the new salon.
As the questioner pointed out, the typos and missing characters can be quite noticeable. Since I also write books and other material for work, I often proofread documents, so typos tend to catch my eye.
I try not to be too concerned because this isn’t a professional setting, but even so, I’ve been thinking for some time that there are simply too many errors.
I understand it may be difficult, given that many women probably come in to register every day, but perhaps you could consider having at least two staff members review the introduction written for each woman being added to the blacklist, checking both the content and whether it contains any typos or omissions.
The way an introduction is written can greatly affect how a woman is perceived. Even when the woman herself has done nothing wrong, typos can make her come across as less intelligent than she really is.
I would appreciate it if you could continue working toward even better management.
Maezawa from the President’s Office here as well.
I make typos myself, so I’m not really one to talk, but
as you said, it would be better to double-check before uploading a woman’s profile.
Running it through a typo and omission checker might also help catch assumptions and misunderstandings.
By the way, I ran the questioner’s post through a checking program, and the word “確認” (“check/confirm”) was flagged, displaying the following:
(There was nothing wrong with the questioner’s wording, but apparently avoiding this word can make the meaning less ambiguous. It’s complicated.)
【Multiple usages】This word can easily make it unclear whether something is complete or incomplete, possible or impossible, and so on. Particular care is needed when it appears as a standalone noun, in a sentence fragment, with a possibility expression, in the passive voice, or in the negative form.
To make the meaning clear, you may want to add words as appropriate or try rewriting the sentence without using this word.
1. Were you planning to check/confirm it?
2. Was it an instruction that it should be checked?
3. Had the checking process been completed? (For example, in the case of possibility.)
4. Had something been officially recognized? (For example, in the case of possibility.)
5. Did the check reveal an abnormality? (For example, in the case of possibility.)
6. Was it checked and found to be normal? (In the negative or passive form.)
7. Was the checking process itself impossible? (In the negative or passive form.)
8. Was the check neglected? (In the negative form.)
9. Was it checked but found to be insufficient? (In the negative or passive form.)
I’m a male member in Seattle.
I guess that’s how it is after all. When you look at it from an outsider’s perspective, the fact that everything isn’t completely polished lets the staff’s personalities come through, which is interesting in its own way.
Still, I’d like Universe Club to maintain its upscale image. Couldn’t they do a little more checking themselves before uploading things?
