I’m a male member.

I’m Maezawa from the president’s office, and I’ll answer this as well. > For example, if she’s a Gold C-type woman, I feel that ¥30,000 is a sufficient amount. Does that mean many female members don’t feel the same way? First of all, the premise—that “if she’s Gold”—is flawed. The criteria for Gold haven’t been clearly defined numerically, so they vary widely depending on the staff member or branch. To put it bluntly, a woman who should really be Black may end up being classified as Gold. In that case, she may normally receive over ¥100,000 elsewhere besides Universe. So discussing it in terms of “if she’s Gold” is based on an inaccurate premise to begin with. There’s also the male perspective, separate from the staff’s point of view. A woman may not seem particularly attractive to most men, but could be incredibly appealing to one specific man—perhaps one in a million. To that man, she may be worth even more than an ordinary Black. That’s another reason why saying “because she’s Gold” doesn’t really make sense. So I think the two of you should discuss this and decide together. When people start talking about the going rate and things like that, I can’t help wondering whether the man is simply being stingy. Everyone has different ideas about what’s reasonable and different financial circumstances. The woman should decide how much allowance she would be comfortable receiving from this particular man, and the man should decide what terms he would be comfortable with for this particular woman. The best outcome is for both of them to agree on terms that make them happy. > ¥30,000 × 8 days = ¥240,000 I’m not sure what this calculation means, but does the person asking want a monthly allowance of ¥240,000? There’s no single right way to structure the relationship. Some people may prefer that kind of proposal. Rather than asking here, wouldn’t it be better to ask the woman directly, “Would you be willing to do this for an allowance of ¥240,000 per month?” That way, you can reach a conclusion.