I’m a male member, and I have a question about paying transportation expenses in advance.
This content is machine-translated.
The membership terms state that transportation expenses must “always be paid in advance,” so I understood this to be a rule. It is also included in the membership terms updated last month.
However, I understand that President Kida and the staff sometimes say that it is not a rule.
Could you please clarify whether it is a rule or not?
If it is not a rule, I would appreciate it if this clause could be removed from the membership terms.
Maezawa from the CEO’s office here.
When I previously wrote, “Please follow the rules,” it caused quite an uproar.
Paying the allowance upfront is definitely a rule, but people started saying, “I asked the staff, and they said it isn’t a rule.”
There was even a new staff member who said they hadn’t been taught that upfront payment was a rule. When I wondered why, it turned out to be because it had been written incorrectly in the internal manual.
So, since there were male members who hadn’t been informed that it was a rule, I had to make an urgent request to clarify things. That was how I put out the fire.
If it’s currently stated in the rules, then naturally the newer version takes precedence.
> It’s also written in the membership terms updated last month.
If that’s the case, shouldn’t you simply recognize it as a rule? I don’t understand why you wouldn’t believe something written in the membership terms.
If it’s written there, shouldn’t you just follow it?
Even with laws, wouldn’t the newer law currently in effect take precedence over one from decades ago?
Are you a child?
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
