I’m a male member in my 50s.

I’m Meg, a female member. You don’t have to be scared. I registered as Type D, but it wasn’t because I was after money. If anything, I’m happier with someone who takes things slowly. There are Type D women like that, too. So don’t worry. I’m wearing pants.

I’m Maezawa from the CEO’s office, and I’ll answer this one as well. Thank you for your question. I’m not quite sure what you’re trying to say, but I think you may be misunderstanding something by treating dating type C and dating type D as the same. With dating type C, there’s a 50% chance of becoming intimate that same day, so it’s perfectly fine for only 50% of the arrangements to be decided that day. I don’t really understand why you think it has to be decided on the same day. And I don’t think it’s appropriate to arbitrarily treat dating types D and C as identical. If you want to take things slowly in the first place, you can simply make an offer to someone with dating type B. So I don’t really see why you needed to ask this question.

I’m Kazu, a male member. I haven’t had that kind of experience. If you’d rather not make things explicit, why not offer an allowance for dinner-only dates that’s the same as—or close to—the allowance for an adult relationship (intimate)? Women in the C or D category aren’t necessarily sex-dependent, so if they can receive a sufficient allowance even without an adult relationship, I think they’d be willing to see you without intimacy. However, if you continue this arrangement for a while, the relationship may become fixed in that pattern. Then, if you eventually want to move toward an adult relationship, it might be harder to do so. Put simply, once she’s receiving a sufficient allowance for dinner-only dates, the allowance for an adult relationship may start to seem too low.