It seems that many people here use pay-per-meeting arrangements, but I feel that things often shift to a monthly arrangement as the relationship deepens. This is just my personal impression and may not be universally true, though...
This content is machine-translated.
So my question is: Does one papa (a male supporter) ever use both monthly and regular arrangements, depending on the woman—for example, a monthly arrangement with one woman and a regular arrangement with another?
Also, if you have any criteria for deciding which women to put on a monthly arrangement and which not to, I’d appreciate it if you could share them. Thank you.
Mamiya from Universe Club’s Marketing Unit here.
I haven’t conducted an actual survey, but my impression is that many men prefer to start with a pay-per-meeting arrangement.
Since we provide one-on-one introductions, they may switch to a monthly arrangement once they find someone they like. However, because Universe offers so many women to choose from, many men may tend to start with pay-per-meeting dates.
Of course, some men choose a monthly arrangement because pay-per-meeting is inconvenient. It really depends on the individual, but monthly arrangements also come with more potential drawbacks and complications, so people seem to be more cautious about them these days.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
I’m だて◎ゆめ, a male member.
I only have one female partner, but at her request, we’ve arranged things on a pay-per-meeting basis. Her reason was, “Getting my allowance each time gives me something to look forward to when we meet.”
However, pay-per-meeting can sometimes mean our meetings have to be short due to my schedule, which makes her income unpredictable. So even when we have a short meeting, I keep her monthly support amount the same and treat it as a fixed monthly arrangement.
In my case, I don’t do anything intimate in public restrooms, and it seems to be well received by her since she can count on stable monthly support. (笑)
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
Maezawa from the president’s office here—I’ll answer as well.
Thanks for your question.
I think everyone has their own way of thinking about it. If a man prefers a monthly arrangement, he probably wouldn’t differentiate between women and would make all of his arrangements monthly.
That said, there’s always the risk that communication may suddenly stop after switching to a monthly arrangement. He may also have had that happen in the past, so he’d probably start with a pay-per-meeting arrangement to see whether he can trust the woman, and switch to a monthly arrangement once he feels comfortable.
It ultimately depends on the man, so some may use different arrangements for different women.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
I’m Paper Airplane, a male member.
A monthly arrangement applies when the woman requests it.
There’s no difference in the standards.
P.S. The best setup is for the woman to suggest a monthly amount and number of meetings, then meet on a pay-per-meeting basis under those terms. That way, even if the number of meetings increases, she can receive more than the monthly amount. And since men are happy when a woman wants to see them, the total won’t fall below the monthly amount either.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
