This is a follow-up question after going along with a woman’s lie. First of all, why do you think the female respondents aren’t answering? Respondents are volunteers, so they’re free to indulge in self-admiration or bragging, but have you ever stopped to consider that this may hurt women who genuinely appreciate and care for their papas?

Question

It’s easy to encourage someone who boasts about her “smart” style of never contacting him first. All she has to do is make a bigger show of wanting to meet than the others. Then, by unconsciously favoring her over the girl who genuinely looks up to him, he ends up hurting the other women. It’s also easy to deal with someone who boasts that every woman he meets falls for him. All you have to do is show more affection than the others. Then, once both of them have reached the peak of their self-esteem, all you have to do is plot to send them crashing to the bottom. They’re really that easy to manipulate. Women have a higher tolerance for pain and discomfort than men, so even when something is disgusting and painful enough to make them feel sick, they can hide it without showing the slightest sign. That’s how they choose the most effective moment to say or do something hurtful to these deluded old men who overestimate themselves, in order to get back at them for all the disgusting things they’ve been subjected to. The other women who genuinely look up to him understand this perfectly well. They put up with it despite being hurt, because saying so would lower their own value. Some people claimed that treating everyone equally demonstrates their character, but this is the perfect example of inequality in the name of equality. Treating a woman who genuinely admires you the same as someone who finds you disgusting but puts on an act for the money is both absurd and morally reprehensible. I deliberately raised this provocative issue because I sincerely want papa-katsu (compensated dating in Japan) to become something where women who genuinely appreciate and look up to their papas are rewarded. I was appalled by the shallow thinking and lack of self-awareness shown in the pitiful response from those who said I’m not suited for this. I believe the phrases “right or left” are symbolic of the words that come out of these despicable women’s mouths from the very beginning, which is why I consider them morally reprehensible. Why not start by making it a policy at Universe not to offer dates to female members who use these phrases? And why not work toward making the club a place where papa-katsu women who genuinely look up to their papas can be rewarded more fairly? What do you think?

Answer 1

I’m a male member, Fullerene! Hmm, I think the person asking this should start their own club. There’s no such thing as a world where everyone is treated equally. That aside: > All you have to do is show that you want to see him more than the others. Then he favors that girl over the ones who genuinely care about him, unintentionally hurting the others. I’ve thought about this (whether they’re actually hurt is another matter). But even if someone shows that they want to see him more, that doesn’t guarantee they’ll actually get to meet him. So when that girl gets brushed off or has plans repeatedly postponed, she may be getting hurt too. Even so, I find it endearing when someone is tough enough to keep showing interest without giving up. Of course, I can’t grant every request.

Answer 2

Maezawa from the CEO’s Office will answer this one too. The question is: “Why do you think the female respondents aren’t answering in the first place?” That’s all it says—the rest is just him going on about what he wants to say. I thought it was such an empty question that it didn’t even need to be displayed. However, since it received a lot of answers, I’ll leave it up. Still, this level of fixation is something else… Thinking that there are male members like this, I feel sorry for the women who have gone on dates with him. If you’ve encountered a man like this, I’d appreciate it if you could share feedback saying you met such a strange guy. As for the answer to the question: it’s not as though women have only stopped answering this particular question, so trying to force that conclusion doesn’t make sense. Women haven’t been answering the other questions lately either. There are simply fewer people answering, or the people who do answer are busy. The way he interprets everything to suit himself… I think he may be a pretty dangerous person.

Answer 3

Aizawa, Sub-Chief at Universe Club Tokyo, will answer as well. All of the respondents here answer voluntarily and without compensation, so they’re free to choose whether or not to respond. I don’t know why no one has answered, but if I had to guess, perhaps the post was too long for them to feel like reading, difficult to read because it wasn’t broken into paragraphs, or the strong wording made them hesitate because they feared being attacked if they got involved. Papa-katsu (compensated dating in Japan) is supposed to be an arrangement where women who care about their papas are rewarded. As for why a woman might care about her male supporter, I think it varies from person to person and depends on how they see things. Some care about him for his personality. Some care about him because he gives them money. Others care about him because he takes them to nice places. Since it depends on what each person values, I don’t think there’s one correct answer. > Have you ever been conscious of the fact that your answers might hurt other people? This question itself has the potential to hurt various people, so I’d appreciate it if you could take a moment to calm down.

Answer 4

I’m Flag Maker, a column writer. The reason female respondents don’t answer is that they don’t want to get dragged into something pointless and end up hurt. It’s obviously dangerous—like sticking your finger into a shredder. Women are all smart enough to know that. Female respondents aren’t rappers. This isn’t a rap battle, so unless you make the content a little gentler and easier for women to respond to, I don’t think they’re going to answer. Though it would be hilarious to have a female rapper among the respondents—just cutting both the questioner and the respondent down mercilessly, lol. Something like: “That interpretation is a misunderstanding. And as for you, I’ll be the one to finish you off.”

Answer 5

I’m Hikouki, a male member. > A woman who is genuinely grateful to her papa and looks up to him If you replace “papa” with a big-spending customer at a hostess club or men’s esthetic salon, it becomes: A woman who is genuinely grateful to her generous regular and looks up to him. When men think that way and believe a popular woman feels that way about them, it’s 100% an act and 100% the man’s misunderstanding. Men who are willing to pay money just to meet women would answer as many questions as they wanted if it were free. Women who put up with this even while being paid have no reason to answer questions exactly the way you want when they aren’t being paid at all. So I’d like someone to tell me exactly what part of the question was supposedly “extreme”… Also, women start papa-katsu (compensated dating in Japan) because, although it’s something none of them would ever want to do if they didn’t have to, it pays better than a regular job. Please learn from that. Men wouldn’t join a club and pay such high fees either if they didn’t have a reason to… Are we over-justifying and romanticizing papa-katsu (compensated dating in Japan)? Besides, compared with us elderly people, who have nothing to do, whose income keeps coming in without us doing anything, and who are merely waiting to die—though in the old days, life expectancy was said to be only fifty, so we should be grateful simply to be alive in this era— wouldn’t it be impossible for these young women, who have promising futures ahead of them and are busy shining brightly, to have any time at all to entertain foolish questions?

Answer 6

I’m Kazu, a male member. “Unequality in the name of equality”—exactly. I don’t think true equality exists in this world. What is equal for one person may be unequal for someone else. For example, I believe a poll tax is fairer than a progressive income tax. Since the government services people receive don’t increase according to their income, and everyone receives roughly the same amount of services, I think it’s fair for everyone to bear the same tax burden. However, some people argue that those with higher incomes are more privileged, so they should bear a greater tax burden in the name of equality. Your question contains many claims based on assumptions, not just opinions about equality—for example, the idea that “women have a greater tolerance for pain and discomfort than men.” Perhaps you should first recognize and accept that there are people in this world who think differently from you. By the way, how exactly do you distinguish papa-katsu women who genuinely look up to their papa (a male supporter)? A woman you consider to be “genuinely devoted” might not seem devoted at all to another man. Not only is the idea that everyone should conform to your values difficult to accept, I also found it excessively arrogant. I assume the female respondents didn’t answer because they were either busy or simply didn’t feel like responding.

6 answers

🏆 Select as Best Answer

✉️ Set a password

6 answers

Related Questions

🏆 Select as Best Answer

✉️ Set a password