Um, it’s Joe.
Mac defended me by calling it the ramblings of a drunk, but unfortunately? It was true. If anything, I was about 20% hornier than that. I guess I just happened not to get caught.
I don’t really have any objections. Is the questioner a woman? If I offended you, I can’t honestly say I’m sorry, but I’ll bow my head for now. Sorry.
If you’re a man, I genuinely can’t understand why you’d take issue with standing rear-entry here. Still, I’m sorry.
I’ll be holding a little self-reflection session in a suite at a members-only resort hotel in Hakone—two double rooms, a jacuzzi-style open-air bath, and 115 square meters. Have a lovely day.
Maezawa from the President’s Office will answer as well.
Have you heard of “freedom of expression”?
I don’t understand what the problem is with this matter.
As for whether what was written is obscene, I didn’t find the post particularly obscene. Ultimately, though, I believe that would be for a court to decide.
Even if it isn’t obscene, and the issue is instead whether it’s appropriate for a member, that decision should be left to the branch staff. At least, I didn’t think this post was bad enough to be considered inappropriate for a member.
Besides, if we worried about that every time, I feel like we’d end up unable to answer many questions.
As for whether what happened in the gondola constitutes public indecency, I can’t say because I wasn’t there.
For example, if the same thing happened inside a hotel room, I don’t think it would constitute public indecency. “Public” refers to a situation that can be perceived by an unspecified number of people or by many people (Supreme Court decision of May 22, 1957), and the inside of a hotel room would not be considered public.
As for the gondola, once it starts moving, no one else can enter. In that sense, it could be considered similar to a hotel room.
However, gondolas have windows, so if the people inside remained visible from outside, it might be considered public. On the other hand, they may have taken measures in advance to prevent anyone outside from seeing in.
Also, “standing from behind” usually seems to refer to sexual activity, but it’s impossible to determine whether that was really the case.
They may simply have hugged the woman from behind while standing and fully clothed.
So in the end, unless someone witnessed the entire incident and properly secured evidence, what’s written here doesn’t even amount to a confession. If the matter went to court and the person said that wasn’t what they meant, they would likely be found not guilty due to the lack of evidence.
In the first place, I don’t think there’s anything enjoyable about nitpicking details like that. Rather than trying to drag other people down, I think you’d be happier focusing on something else.
