It’s annoying when someone wants to have me all to themselves without even stating the allowance they’re offering.
This content is machine-translated.
Wouldn’t it be possible to introduce a system that automatically hides someone after they make an offer? Having to ask the staff to hide them every time is such a hassle.
Why keep them visible at all?
I’m Maezawa from the President’s Office, and I’ll answer this as well.
Thank you for your question.
> Why do you keep showing them?
Actually, as part of our previous staff procedures, we used to hide women from the men they had already gone on a date with.
It may have been limited to the Kanto area, but I believe we continued doing this for quite a long time.
However, some men would contact us when someone disappeared from their view. When we explained that the profile had been hidden because they had already gone on a date, some of them became upset.
In the end, I think that about four years ago, a new rule was introduced: if some men were going to get angry about it, we simply wouldn’t hide profiles after a date.
Of course, another factor may have been that it was inefficient for staff to manually hide profiles after every date.
Personally, I think it would be fine to hide them after a date. However, some men still want to see them afterward, so it seems difficult to implement across the board.
For now, please contact us individually each time with a request such as:
“Please hide this man from my profile.”
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
I’m Marika, a female member.
I think all women feel the same way, don’t they? I’d like men who criticize this to understand that it’s male nature that makes women feel this way.
In short, it’s a nuisance having to check the women who make offers later.
If this feature—hiding profiles after an offer is made—were implemented, popular women would receive even more offers. Wouldn’t that easily make up for the cost of making such a small change? What do you think?
Sorry for answering with a question.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
I’m Date◎Yume, a male member.
> It’s annoying when someone wants to have me all to themselves without even stating the allowance they’re offering.
They don’t state the allowance they’re offering because they can’t afford to.
Try working on yourself so you can become a more attractive woman...
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
I’m Kazu, a male member.
Hmm… couldn’t you simply say clearly, “I don’t do exclusivity. If you pay me ¥○○ a month upfront for ○○ years, I’ll consider it”? That way, the man would understand exactly what he’s asking for.
After an online date, when meeting in person, I’d like to be able to refer back to the woman’s profile for her dining preferences and relationship type. The other day, I met in person with a woman I’d had an online date with over a month earlier. We arranged the date on LINE, but when I went to check her dining preferences, I was surprised to find that she had already left the service. It was fine because I asked her on LINE what she wanted to eat, but asking about her relationship type is a little awkward, haha.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
Takahashi, the Kanto unit manager, would also like to respond.
Thank you for your question.
At present, a profile remains visible unless we receive a request to hide it or are asked to suspend it for reasons such as taking a temporary leave of absence.
That said, feedback like this is valuable to us and will serve as a reference for the future. Thank you for sharing your valuable opinion.
We appreciate your continued support.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
I’m Paper Airplane, a male member, and I think men who request a temporary suspension or withdrawal should be forcibly removed as well.
If a woman simply reports it as is, the man should be immediately forced to leave.
A rule like that would be perfectly reasonable.
After all, it’s up to the woman what she decides to do.
P.S. Mac
I agree. The rules can be made as strict as necessary, but I also feel the same way about asking about such an individual case here: “Don’t ask stupid questions—ask the staff!”
(I’m more annoyed at the guy, though…)
It puts everyone in an awkward position because it’s difficult for anyone to answer.
Honestly, I almost wish questions about this matter would be deleted or hidden in the future…
P.P.S.
I think hiding it after an offer has been made would be reasonable.
What bothers me about this question is:
> I was appalled by the insensitivity of openly asking in a public Q&A forum for help getting a female member to lie.
Exactly. The problem is that this is being made public.
Every service has behind-the-scenes options that are handled appropriately. Once those options are openly disclosed, they’re no longer behind the scenes, and people who didn’t need to know about them find out. That leaves both men and women with fewer benefits.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
