I'm seeing a Type C girl, but we're not very compatible when it comes to spending time together after dinner. She's a really nice person, though, so I'm thinking that from now on, we could just have a dinner-only relationship if I give her ¥10,000 for transportation. But in the case of a Type C girl, would she be offended if I said, “From now on, dinner only,” since that would mean a lower allowance?
This content is machine-translated.
Also, if I switch to dinner only because of my own circumstances, do you think I should give her a little extra for transportation?
I’m だて◎ゆめ, a male member.
We all have our own circumstances, so when it comes to the allowance, I think it really comes down to discussing it together.
If you have the means and genuinely feel that way, I think saying, “I’d like to add a little extra for transportation,” may help her understand how you feel.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
I’m Saito♪, a columnist.
I recently stopped seeing a woman who received a 25,000-yen allowance for dinner only, because it gradually started to feel ridiculous.
As Mac and the others have said, misunderstandings and mistaken assumptions begin with a lack of communication. Talk things through to resolve them, so don’t hesitate to be open with each other.
If you think, “1万円 would make things easy, but I’d still want to see her even if I paid 3万円…” then don’t play games—tell her honestly and sincerely how you feel.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
Maezawa from the Corporate Planning Office here as well.
> We’re not quite compatible when it comes to intimacy after dinner.
That happens sometimes.
> If a Type C girl is told, “From now on, I’d like to keep it dinner only,” would she be offended because her allowance would be reduced?
If the arrangement had been dinner only from the beginning, I don’t think it would be a problem. But from her perspective, it would probably feel like her allowance was being reduced, and she might also think it’s because she isn’t attractive enough.
That’s why I think you need to have a proper discussion with her.
Ideally, you could continue seeing her for dinner only while keeping the allowance the same as before, but that can be difficult.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
I’m a male member from Seattle.
I’ve had the same concern when I’m seeing a nice girl who’s too tight for penetration. Why not negotiate for a transportation allowance of 1 and occasional meals together? If she feels it would be a waste of time, she’ll turn you down, and many will still agree just to have something to do.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
