Tips
Sep 29, 2019 19:45
This content is machine-translated.
https://universe-club.jp/help/questions/view/2401
I’m not the person who asked the original question, but I’m asking because both answers (as of 7:30 p.m. on September 29), especially Mr. Maezawa’s, were so far off the mark.
If the original questioner has already asked a follow-up question, please disregard mine.
Based on the question, I believe the situation is something like this:
Let’s say there are male members A, B, and C, and female member Z.
C engages in threatening behavior toward Z, and the police become involved.
Normally, information shouldn’t be provided without a warrant, but since this involves specific acts of intimidation, a warrant has been issued.
If the warrant applies only to C (I’m partly speculating here, since I’ve never actually seen what a warrant looks like), I assume only C’s information would be provided. However, what if Z is so shaken that her testimony is vague, or for some other reason the perpetrator cannot be identified as C, and all that is known is that it was someone she met through Universe?
In that situation, would the investigation also extend to A and B, who had previously been set up with Z?
I believe that is what the question is asking.
I assume the questioner’s concern is this: Even though they had a perfectly legitimate relationship, could they be investigated because of a problematic member? In an extreme case, could the police suddenly show up at their workplace?
I would appreciate your response.
3 answers
Other
I’m Saito, a column writer♪
I’m sorry—I misunderstood and gave the wrong answer.
You’re right.
🏅 あなたの味方
お役に立てれば幸いです。
Age: Private
👨 Male
Universe staff
I’ll answer as Maezawa from the CEO’s office as well.
You say this is based on your interpretation of the question, but your response relies on a lot of assumptions that weren’t stated. It could very well be completely different from what the questioner intended.
I honestly don’t understand how you read it and arrived at that line of thinking.
So even after your explanation, I still don’t believe that’s what the person who asked the question actually meant.
👨 Male
Universe member
I’m Date◎Yume, a male member.
> Since Z was so shocked that they gave an unclear statement, along with various other reasons, the culprit C couldn’t be identified. All that’s known is that the person was someone Z met through Universe. In this situation, would A and B, who have previously had first meetings with Z, also come under investigation?
The issue is who actually made the specific threats. I don’t think the police would investigate A or B based solely on an ambiguous statement.
The police would probably start by looking for physical evidence. Unless they can determine who sent the emails or made the phone calls, I don’t think a court would issue a search warrant.