I’m the person who submitted the question.

Maezawa from the President’s Office will answer as well. The contents of the two URLs are completely different—the first appears to concern personal information, while the other seems to be about women’s rankings or classifications. So I suspect the wrong URL may have been copied. This is just my assumption, but I wonder if the issue is that they previously said they would not disclose information even if contacted by the police without a court warrant, whereas this time they are saying they will provide personal information even without one. Previously, I believe a lawyer advised that they should adhere strictly to the warrant requirement, and that they decided to do so. However, that policy was intended to prevent the police from overstepping their authority. I feel that cooperating with police investigations as much as possible is only natural. Given that this is provided for by law, and that most companies respond to inquiries when presented with a formal investigative inquiry from the police, my personal view is that Universe can do the same. That said, I wanted to emphasize that this is not necessarily the company’s official policy. Therefore, if you would like to know the company’s formal policy, I think you should submit a written inquiry to the company under your real name. Also, even if this was the company’s policy, I don’t think it would be unusual for it to change. It would be difficult to insist that they must follow something forever simply because that was their position in the past. As for consistency in my personal statements, please understand that the newer statement reflects my current view.

I’m だて◎ゆめ, a male member. I’m not quite sure what your question is getting at... I take it to mean: “If you want to know the company’s official policy, please submit a proper inquiry to the company and receive a formal response. The question box is a place where individuals share what they think, even if they might be mistaken.” Is that what you mean?