How about introducing special benefits for reputable male members?

I’m Maezawa from the President’s Office, and I’ll answer this one too. As you said, some kind of rating system for men might be a good idea. Not exactly like the Michelin Guide, but perhaps something along the lines of: Starting with no stars, then ★ (one star) ★★ (two stars) ★★★ (three stars) Would there be comments like, “This man is a three-star supporter, so you can feel safe meeting him”? Or perhaps men could start with three stars, just like women do, and lose one star each time they fail to pay transportation expenses in advance, or cancel at the last minute. That way, if a man only has one star, women might think, “There must be something off about him,” and either decline his offer or at least be more cautious when accepting it.

This is Saito, your columnist♪ I imagine men have their share of issues too, like canceling at the last minute or repeatedly forgetting to cover transportation expenses.

I’m Date◎Yume, a male member. I think it’s a very good proposal. However, thinking about it carefully, determining whether someone is a “high-quality male member” would probably require judging them based on a certain level of experience. What should be considered—number of offers, length of membership, or something else? There seem to be quite a few factors to think through. For example, if the number of offers were used, someone might seem like a good male member, but then you might think, “He’s quite the playboy, isn’t he? He’s certainly active. I wonder if there’s any concern about infections? (Laughs)” and so on. So, perhaps it would be better to mention it in a male member’s profile only when he seems unusual enough that he may not be a typical male member of the club, thereby helping female members decide whether to accept an offer.