First meeting: 1
Dinner: 2
Adult relationship: 5
If we become intimate starting at the first meeting: 6
From the second meeting onward:
Dinner followed by intimacy: 7
Meeting for intimacy only: 5
That’s honestly enough to make people think it’s prostitution, isn’t it?
I’m worried about Universe, so I wanted to ask because I feel women like this should be removed.
👤Asked byGuest👨GenderMale🎂40s👑Universe male member
There are plenty of women who set their desired allowance as “open to discussion” and then send messages phrased like that.
If you’re comfortable with the terms, you can meet her; if not, you can simply decline. So perhaps try to view it positively—you found out before making an offer.
Hope this helps.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
If you don’t like PATOLO, you can simply stop using it.
And if you’re concerned, you can just speak directly to the staff.
The people in charge of PATOLO are operating the system fully aware that they could be arrested for it, so I did wonder what you expected to accomplish by asking here…
Ah, I see—you deliberately posted this here because you want the police to take action quickly.
I understand.
In that case, it isn’t really a question, but I’ll make it visible and cooperate.
Come to think of it, a while ago, the president and several employees of a dating site that had posts suggestive of prostitution were arrested.
I vaguely remember seeing comments in the news saying they thought it would be okay as long as they censored the term, like “援○.”
With Universe, you wouldn’t have to worry about things like that, so maybe you should just quit PATOLO?
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
I searched Patro among all female users for terms like “6 from the first meeting if it’s an adult relationship” and “5 if we’re meeting for an adult relationship only,” but no one came up.
Do women like that really exist? And not just in private messages?
In cases like this, I think guidance—not removal—is what’s needed. Just tell them to discuss those terms individually through messages rather than putting them in their profiles.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
There are women like that, and there are women who are the complete opposite. The same goes for men—both types exist.
Isn’t it okay for each of them to exist?
People don’t have to be all the same. I think it’s perfectly fine for everyone to be their own individual.
You could even say that people with contrasting qualities make each other shine.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
It’s definitely not this direct, but there are profiles that basically say you need to offer at least ¥〇〇〇,〇〇〇 to go beyond dinner.
Are there things people can’t fit in the section for their desired allowance?
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
