I met him on UC and saw him once or twice, but he didn’t seem interested. Then he contacted me again a year later.

He asked if I could come to a place two hours from my home by 10 a.m. the next morning. He’s in his 60s, runs a licensed professional practice, has several businesses, and kept emphasizing his high status and wealth. His allowance was ⚒️3. A weekday morning meeting is extremely inconvenient for me because I have work and need time to get ready, so I asked for 3.5 at the minimum to cover the actual transportation costs. He ignored me. Thanks in part to this message board, I’ve learned a lot, but the whole thing was just too disappointing. I think he invited me fully expecting to be turned down, and since I didn’t want to go anyway, I intentionally negotiated the allowance. I already disliked him from the start. I don’t mind being treated like a sex worker in this kind of situation, but if he showed some consideration for the transportation costs, time, and location, I would consider him a good papa (and my standards are already pretty low). If I had put up with it and traveled two hours to meet him at 10 for ⚒️3, I definitely would have made more money. But even though I can swallow my pride over a low allowance, I can’t tolerate situations this stressful—early morning, long distance, no transportation money (though I don’t ask for it when the distance is short)—so I end up cutting things off. Does this still make me too money-minded? I’m willing to meet someone on a lower allowance if he’s a good person, even if he doesn’t have much money. That’s my way of being considerate. Do girls who agree to a low allowance count as being money-minded too?