I’m Potassium, a female member.
I’ve been testing how the club’s system works with papas, and although I haven’t measured whether things disappear after one month, based on my testing below, I don’t think whether a “Nice” comment is included has anything to do with the one-month display period.
(From a system perspective, I don’t see why they would need separate systems for displaying all female members who received a “Nice” and displaying only part of them. Apparently, in the full list, they’re shown regardless of whether there’s a comment.)
I haven’t seen the actual screen myself, but apparently when a man makes his profile public or updates it, he moves up near the top of the menu where women send “Nice,” so he receives quite a lot of likes.
Apparently, there’s a screen somewhere on the men’s side that displays only a few “Nice” messages, shown in the order they were sent. Papas apparently only look through those few profiles.
When there are more “Nice” messages, the women displayed there are constantly replaced. There also seems to be a page where men can view the full list, but apparently they don’t go out of their way to check “Nice” messages there.
※This is just my assumption, but if a man sees the woman he’s looking for among the few profiles displayed, he’s more likely to move straight to the offer page. That’s why I felt there was no point in testing whether they remain visible for one month.
By the way, whether there’s a comment or not doesn’t seem to matter for the few profiles that are displayed. (I tested this.)
If you want to receive an offer through a “Nice” message, you’re more likely to appear among the few “Nice” messages a man sees if you send one with a comment to a man who appears on the last page, rather than to someone near the top of the search results.
That said, men who appear on the last page may not actually be logging in, so in a way, the safest choice is probably someone in the middle of the list. lol
This is based on my guesses and the results of testing with just one of my papas, so I think the club staff would be the most reliable source of information about how the system works.
This got a little off-topic, but I hope it helps.
Though I don’t think knowing this actually makes much difference. lol
※Mr. Maezawa
I’ve shared quite a bit about what I tested, so if there’s anything problematic from the club’s perspective, I’d appreciate it if you could edit the post.
※To my papa
This was something I heard before, and I’ve forgotten some of the details, so please message me on LINE if anything is incorrect.
P.S.
My papa contacted me on LINE and said that “Nice” messages disappear exactly one month later, regardless of whether they include a comment.
So, to answer the question: comments don’t matter.
>Mr. Maezawa
I’m glad there doesn’t seem to be a problem. lol
Thank you.
I did have my papa read through all of the club rules again before sharing any system information with me, so we’ve made sure not to violate the rules…
>Marika
Hehe, I’m being praised! lol
It’s all thanks to teaming up with my papa. lolol
As Marika said, this is probably something you should ask the staff about.
That said, I wonder if many women hesitate because they think asking might somehow put them at a disadvantage.
For purely functional questions, I don’t think asking would normally hurt you, though.
Also, I believe some of the respondents mentioned trying different things with their own papa, like seeing what would happen if they did this or that. So it might be worth trying different things with your papa as well.
That said, regarding this question, I assume it’s about checking whether a different program runs when a comment is posted versus when there’s no comment. But I suppose we’d have to ask a programmer to know for sure.
Thinking about it normally, though, I doubt they would create separate programs, so I assume the same process runs whether or not a comment is added.
If that’s the case, even with a comment, it should behave the same way as when there’s no comment.
By the way, it sounds like there’s also talk of extending the one-month period. I wonder if extending it would offer any benefit...
P.S. Potassium, thank you.
There’s apparently only an internal report saying something like, “We implemented it this way,” so the details can’t really be known without asking the person who created the program. That’s why reports of the test results are very helpful.
Since this isn’t really something to ask anonymously to gather a wide range of opinions on, I think it would be most accurate to ask the staff directly.
Marika
Potassium, you’re amazing. It was worth the questioner asking here.
