Why are there so few generous papa supporters among the people answering here?

Two posts in a row—well done with your campaign to try to raise your allowance. I imagine you’re a lovely woman who kindly keeps company with papas aged 60 and over. Japan’s personal financial assets total ¥1,946 trillion, and households headed by someone aged 60 or older hold about 70% of that (68.5%). In other words, people aged 60 and over own 70% of Japan’s personal assets. Statistically speaking, I assume you’ll continue receiving one offer after another from lovely papas aged 60 and over. Best wishes going forward.

I’ll define a generous papa as someone who offers a high allowance per meeting. As I mentioned in another answer, I currently believe the median is 5, so I think it’s normal for 5 to be the most common amount. To begin with, I don’t think there are that many generous papas out there. So my answer is that you’re simply an attractive woman who happens to attract generous papas, rather than your experience reflecting the overall statistical situation. As for whether this is helpful, I think that depends on how you choose to interpret it. Personally, I believe both the allowance and the nature of the relationship matter, and that overall satisfaction is what’s important. In that sense, the experiences shared by others may offer some useful insight into how these relationships work. If the overall satisfaction is high, the relationship will continue, which likely means both people are happy with the arrangement. I just hope there will be fewer people who are only doing this because they desperately need the money, and have to put up with things, as well as fewer people who think that paying means they’re entitled to anything and everything.

If you became one of the people answering questions, this place might really liven up. (⑅•ᴗ•⑅)◜..°♡

If the questioner is already seeing a generous papa (well-paying), I don’t see what the problem is… If you don’t think it’s helpful, you can simply choose not to read it.

Just as women don’t want to take advice from women who receive a low allowance, men generally don’t want to take advice from men who pay a high allowance. Women feel embarrassed about receiving too little, while men feel embarrassed about paying too much. This creates a gender-opposed basic pattern: female respondents with high allowances and male respondents with low allowances are the ones whose opinions are actually useful. Thanks for all the back-to-back posts. Not many people post repeatedly like that…