When I see women’s profiles asking for a fairly high monthly amount, do they assume that one man can make time for several dates a month? In a previous question, someone answered that once an arrangement becomes long-term, it usually settles into about one date a month. That’s how things have worked out for me as well. Of course, there are men who are fine with paying that amount even for one date a month, but there must also be men who think, “That much for just once a month?” I understand that women may have arrangements with multiple papas, but when I see this, I assume the woman is looking for what you might call a generous (well-paying) papa (a male supporter), or is expecting to have multiple papas, so I leave her out of consideration for an offer. The way women phrase this in their profiles seems to vary depending on the branch. What do you think?

Maezawa will answer. > Do you really think one man can make time for dates several times a month? Most women are registering for the first time, so that is a possibility. > Aren’t there men who think, “That’s supposed to be once a month?” I think everyone will see it differently. But all we’re doing is asking about her preferences when she comes in for her interview, before she really knows much about dating clubs. So I think it’s perfectly fine to talk things over and start seeing each other if your terms work for both of you. If a woman says, “I’m hoping for this much allowance, assuming we meet about three times a month,” then you could simply ask: “I can only meet once a month, but I’d like a monthly arrangement. Would those terms work for you?” For example, even if a woman is asking for a high allowance, it doesn’t mean you’re guaranteed to start seeing her just by offering that amount. Women have preferences too. Even if you meet her requested terms, the arrangement won’t continue unless she actually wants to spend time with you. On the other hand, if a woman really wants to see a particular man, they may start seeing each other even if his terms are below what she initially requested. It’s fine to choose women based on their profiles, but as they say, seeing someone in person is worth more than hearing a hundred descriptions. If you’re interested in a woman, I think it’s also important to meet her and see for yourself. > It seems like the way women’s profile preferences are described varies from branch to branch. What do you think? How a woman chooses to see a man is ultimately something between the two of them. Even if the club asks about her preferences during the interview, I don’t think those necessarily reflect what she truly wants. Men want to know what women are looking for. They ask us why we don’t tell them. Women also say they want their preferences communicated to men, because then they can receive that amount without having to discuss money themselves. But Universe doesn’t share those details. That said, the branches can’t simply ignore requests from men. As a compromise, we decided it would be acceptable to ask about a woman’s desired monthly allowance. (Within the club, it’s currently okay to ask about it.) Because of this, some branches actively include that information, while others leave it out in accordance with the company policy of leaving such matters up to the two people involved. I think these differences between branches are one of Universe’s strengths. Hopefully, when you come across women with different perspectives at different branches, you’ll see it as an opportunity to make new discoveries.