An update and question about a gentleman in his 90s
This content is machine-translated.
The offer was today. I can’t do H without feelings, and apparently he never used to fool around. His wife passed away seven years ago, and he signed up because he was unbearably lonely.
He hadn’t done anything for years, but he started feeling like he wanted to, even though he couldn’t get hard after such a long time, so we decided to try oral once. As I was doing that, he gradually became a little hard.
Was he getting excited? During 69,
he said, “I’m about to come…” Even though he didn’t become fully hard,
he was able to climax.
He was very happy and said today was a memorable day.
When I discussed the allowance with the Chairman, he initially said 5,
but since he couldn’t have intercourse, I said 3 instead because 5 seemed like too much.
That’s okay, right?
Should I avoid saying 5 next time?
Please let me know again.
Thank you.
Maezawa from the President’s Office here.
I don’t agree with changing the allowance based on whether penetration happened or not. If the original agreement was 5, I think she should have simply accepted the full 5.
The reason is that some women get haggled down with comments like, “We agreed on 5, but since I couldn’t finish, 3 should be enough, right?”
Of course, the women involved aren’t okay with that. (That’s how the club can find out about these things.)
Even if they went to a hotel together, reducing the allowance because the man couldn’t make it to the end due to his own issues is a breach of the agreement.
I feel sorry for the woman who trusted the original promise.
If men are going to use “I couldn’t finish” as a reason to negotiate, then the woman could just as well say, “I may have worked three times harder than usual, so the effort was three times greater. Please pay me three times as much.”
But men who say things like that are only thinking about themselves, so I doubt they’d accept it even if she put it that way.
So rather than saying things like that, I think men should pay the amount originally agreed upon—if it was 5, then pay 5. Women should also insist on receiving the agreed amount, so other women won’t have to go through the same unpleasant experience.
I think it’s better to view the allowance as payment for the time spent together.
The man probably feels happy getting it cheaper, but I’m worried he’ll start telling other women, “Since I couldn’t finish, make it 3.”
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
I’m Meg, a female member.
You certainly did a wonderful job of making your partner happy.
But how would you feel if someone went into this much detail here about you being attended to by a young guy?
At this point, it’s basically public humiliation play.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
Is it really okay to keep posting such private details one after another?
Is the idea that it’s fine because she’s 90 and doesn’t look at the site?
It struck me as a little insensitive.
Whether it’s 3 or 5, please discuss it with her directly.
But you really do change the allowance depending on whether things go further, huh.
Marika
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
