Quite a few men say discussing the allowance kills the mood, so don’t bring it up—but why are they doing papa-katsu (compensated dating in Japan) in the first place? In that case, they should just use a dating app.
This content is machine-translated.
Don’t they simply not want to acknowledge that they can’t get close to the kind of women they like—especially if they prefer younger women—without giving them money?
I’m Paper Airplane, a male member.
Because it’s more fun that way.
I think dating apps have a stronger sense of prostitution or the sex industry.
I believe you can meet people anywhere, not just through clubs.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
I’m だて◎ゆめ, a male member.
> It’s a turnoff when money comes up.
↑
Don’t you think men who say things like that are looking for women who are a good match for them in all kinds of places to meet people, including apps?
I’m the same way—I’m not really comfortable with making everything about money. Sometimes I even feel they’d be better off using an adult entertainment service rather than a dating club.
> Don’t they simply not want to admit that they can’t get close to the kind of woman they like—especially if they prefer younger women—without giving her money?
↑
I don’t think that’s the case.
I’m sure they understand that perfectly well. It’s probably more like, “I get it, but please don’t keep going on about it.”
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
I’m Aya, one of the female members.
Papa-katsu (compensated dating in Japan) is about winning over that kind of papa (a male supporter) and making big money.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
I’m Flag Maker, a columnist.
Understand the structure. The structure.
Universe simply provides the battlefield and handles the matchmaking. Beyond that, it only sets some basic rules.
On that battlefield, you’ll find women dreaming of finding a good papa (a male supporter) and receiving a generous allowance through a transactional relationship, as well as men who are willing to spend money but want a kind of pretend romance.
If you look at the person in front of you and think, “They’re not at all who I expected,” then turn around, there won’t be any Universe staff standing there. You’re on your own when it comes to weathering the other person’s attacks.
In this battlefield, the women who understand men’s feelings and know how to handle them skillfully, along with the men who understand women’s feelings and behave with good manners, are the ones who rack up the most wins.
Do you understand that and focus on picking up wins, or do you take on as many matches as possible until you find the right person? Those are basically the two choices.
That’s all there is to it.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
I’m Kazu, a male member.
Surely they realize that the reason she agrees to meet them is because they’re giving her an allowance.
If it kills the mood, the man should take the initiative and bring up the subject—or hand over the allowance upfront—so the woman doesn’t have to mention it herself. I honestly don’t understand why some men don’t realize that or do it.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
