Tips
Jan 17, 2019 08:03
I’m concerned after the “bareback” debate, so while I’m at it…
This content is machine-translated.
Aren’t you conducting childish interviews with women at the new branch?
Make sure to ask properly: “Are you able to take the pill?”
“Contraception is the woman’s responsibility when she’s receiving a large allowance”—that’s what men earning “over ¥40 million a year” think, you know.
Going bareback is a premise of the arrangement.
“At dates among the wealthy, women don’t carry wallets, and men don’t carry condoms.”
The staff shouldn’t get into childish debates either.
The same goes for STI prevention.
When going bareback is assumed, there’s only one way to prevent STIs:
“Both parties get tested before the arrangement begins, and once it starts, neither has sex with anyone else.”
So during the interview, be sure to emphasize: “This will be an exclusive arrangement, okay?”
That’s what makes someone a “good woman.”
Don’t reduce it to the childish idea of simply being a “nice woman.”
*Incidentally, men earning “over ¥40 million a year” may demand exclusivity from women while cheating freely themselves, so STI prevention often breaks down there. The large sums women receive are compensation for risks of that kind.
Also, men earning “over ¥40 million a year” are tired of beautiful women, so what they want is something difficult to obtain—in other words, “a celebrity who’s out of their league.”
They may be willing to spare no expense for that opportunity.
That’s all there is to it.
If you’re thinking about anything beyond the points mentioned above, the current Universe Club already covers it sufficiently.
There’s no need to go to the trouble of launching a new branch.
