https://universe-club.jp/men/male-data/
(“Universe Club by the Numbers: Male Members”)
On the page above, there is a section called “Ranking of Relationship Types Men Offer.” Female members’ relationship types are divided into five categories—A, B1, B2, C, and D—with specific explanations for each.
For example:
Relationship Type A: [Dinner Dates] Basically, I’m looking for dates involving tea or a meal. I’m not looking for a relationship that includes physical intimacy.
Relationship Type B1: [Take It Slow] If we go on several dates and hit it off, the relationship may develop further.
Relationship Type B2: [Starting on the Second Date] The first meeting is for a meal only. The relationship may develop further from the second date onward.
With this in mind, would you consider dividing Relationship Type A into A1, for meal-only relationships, and A2, defined as: “If we go on several dates and hit it off, the relationship may develop further, but even if it does, I’m not looking for physical intimacy”?
Alternatively, regarding the B categories, I would like to request that the current B1 be changed to: “If we go on several dates and hit it off, the relationship may develop further, but even if it does, I’m not looking for physical intimacy”; that the current B2 be changed to: “If we go on several dates and hit it off, the relationship may develop further”; and that a new B3 be added with the explanation: “The first meeting is for a meal only. The relationship may develop further from the second date onward.”
Among the female members currently classified as B1 (“If we go on several dates and hit it off, the relationship may develop further”), I believe there are quite a few who would like to pursue a relationship after several dates and hitting it off—that is, go on dates and pursue a relationship beyond simply having meals—but who still do not want physical intimacy even if the relationship develops further.
👤Asked byGuest👨GenderMale🎂Not stated👑Not stated
💗Likes0👁️Views110💬Answers6
🔖ID6mpQ:-00000🎯Looking for answers from
代表者
スタッフ
バックオフィス
To the person who’s been posting long questions about not wanting an intimate relationship—thanks again for all your posts.
I’m not sure what exactly you’re dreaming of, but this is a papa-katsu (compensated dating in Japan) setting involving money. From a woman’s perspective, the A1 and A2 you mentioned are basically the same. So rest assured—there’s no intimate relationship involved.
Since you’re not looking to fall genuinely in love, a date involving money without intimacy is still a relationship, right? lol. Dinner also counts as dating, though…
Everyone knows there are women who label themselves B1 while planning not to have an intimate relationship. Some dinner-only girls also hint at intimacy to receive an allowance. The papas who have enough leeway to enjoy that kind of back-and-forth are the ones who make offers to B, so don’t worry.
I don’t think anything needs to be changed.
First, why not make offers to women in the A category, find someone you like, and ask whether she’d be willing to have the kind of relationship you have in mind? Everyone gets so few offers that they’ll be happy, so go ahead and make offers to women one after another.
An ideal supporter for A has appeared!
If you’re looking for a genuine romantic relationship, you’d probably be better off searching for a woman who’ll genuinely fall for you on a dating app, at an upscale club, or even at neighborhood association events.
Hmm?
Is this actually a woman who wants to target dinner-only arrangements, pretending to be a papa and writing this? Because even with A, if you continue seeing someone, she’ll eventually ask for intimacy?
Are you writing this? But if so, isn’t this way too roundabout? lol
I’m starting to get confused myself.
In any case, please send your requests and opinions to the club staff by joining the club and emailing them directly. Posting them here is pointless, lol.
I’ll keep answering because it’s entertaining, though…
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
Perhaps you’re posting anonymously because it’s a request you can’t make to the staff at your branch.
A few days ago, Flag-san gave an excellent answer:
https://universe-club.jp/help/questions/view/16828
I agree with him. I hope you find it helpful.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
Does that suggestion really serve any purpose?
Whether or not a date progresses to an adult relationship (intimate) isn’t decided by the dating type—it’s up to both people.
Some men are turned down for an adult relationship by women with a D type, while others are able to progress to one with women who have an A type.
Men can also choose to decline an adult relationship with a D-type woman.
No matter how you define the dating types, that fundamental point doesn’t change.
Since this wasn’t a question, I’m just sharing my thoughts.
It’s me.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
