For example, if a woman has two papas and both ask to see her at the exact same time on the same day, which one would she choose?
This content is machine-translated.
Let’s say their allowances, ages, and the amount of time she’d be tied up are all the same.
Papa A is over 100 kg, has a body covered in lots of growths, makes many unusual demands when it comes to intimacy, and expects a second round—but his personality is otherwise fine.
Papa B is smart and handsome-looking, the kind of person who could even appear in promotional photos for the company he runs, but has an emotionally abusive side to his personality.
Even if the men are the ones paying the allowance, I realized that if a woman imagines having other papas, she’d inevitably have a preference.
If men were in the woman’s position, which one would they choose to meet that day?
I wouldn’t date someone who weighs over 100 kg or someone who’s emotionally abusive in the first place.
But if I absolutely had to go on a date with one of them, I’d choose the one offering the higher allowance.
If he weighs over 100 kg, I wouldn’t want to have sex with him unless he had a professional baseball player–type build.
Marika
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
The other day, a man brought two women he was seeing, and the four of us had drinks together. The two women got talking because they had similar experiences.
Their conclusion was: “It’s not about the money, is it?”
Whether things like “lots of kinky requests” or “a second round” are appealing depends on the woman’s preferences. If your kinks match, even unconventional requests can be enjoyable; if not, you’ll simply see him as someone to avoid. The same goes for a second round.
Everyone has their own preferences and circumstances. I think it’s foolish to lump people together by gender and assume all women are a certain way.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
The right answer is the one offering the larger allowance.
From a guy’s perspective, you might want to believe that you’re higher on her list of priorities. But that’s not what matters—the allowance is.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
In any world, there’s competition, so it’s safe to assume that people naturally have their priorities.
As for where you stand in those priorities… who knows? lol
Sorry I couldn’t really answer your question.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
Looks or personality? It’s a tough choice, but I guess personality is more important after all.
I don’t think I could put up with someone who makes me angry when we talk.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
