Question: Are there not many people who agree on a total amount rather than an allowance for each meeting?
This content is machine-translated.
We agree on a total of 100,000 yen and decide with the woman how it will be used. If dinner and a hotel cost 10,000 yen, her allowance is 90,000 yen; if they cost 50,000 yen, her allowance is 50,000 yen. Of course, I sometimes give her presents separately as well.
👤Asked byGuest👨GenderMale🎂Not stated👑Universe male member
There probably aren’t many.
I feel like some women may want as much allowance as possible and prefer going straight to and from a love hotel.
If that’s the case, though, it feels a little different from what I have in mind...
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
Since everyone says this is their first time hearing it, Joe will come clean.
When I joined more than three years ago, I thought, “As long as my annual activity expenses, including offer fees, stay below eight figures in yen, I should be able to keep this up” (embarrassing). So I figured a rough guideline would be around ¥800,000 a month (even more embarrassing).
There’s a saying: “Don’t count your chickens before they hatch.” Things don’t go according to plan, and I eventually realized that with this kind of calculation, I wouldn’t be able to sustain the relationships themselves. In fact, not once in these three years have I managed to keep things within eight figures as planned. Last year, I made an offer to only one woman at Universe—and it didn’t even lead to a relationship—but I still ended up spending more than ever.
At the very least, if you want to have a mistress or similar arrangement in the broader sense, I feel that you generally need around ¥30 million in disposable income for it to work. Maybe it’s about time for me to call it quits.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
There are two women I support on an all-inclusive basis.
One is my ace, and the other is a former ace I got back together with.
I give my ace a monthly allowance of 100, and leave the details of our dates up to her. We meet about once a month, and have an adult relationship about once every two months. In a sense, it’s basically a fixed-total arrangement, isn’t it?
With my former ace, each date is 20. Her coordinator and Maezawa know who she is, but she’s unbelievably beautiful, and we’re incredibly close, so anything we do is fun. Sometimes we go for a drive, and other times we have an adult relationship. She even brings her best friend along sometimes, and the three of us go out together.
The details don’t really matter—in any case, it’s “20 per date.” Isn’t that also basically a fixed-total arrangement?
These two women are on such a high level that I’m satisfied just to be dating them. I’m grateful for their very existence. Because they’re both special to me, beyond a transactional relationship, I don’t have the stingy mindset of refusing to give a generous allowance unless we have an adult relationship.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
That happens too.
Anything left over after the expenses goes entirely to the woman. So if you let her choose the hotel room, the best room can suddenly become the cheapest one. The same goes for meals…
Another pattern is simply giving her the change.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
