Regarding the ☆ ratings for women, is it just me, or do women with high ratings give off the impression that they’re very used to this, which actually makes me less motivated to approach them? I’m sure many people don’t care, but I feel it may not really benefit either side.
This content is machine-translated.
The other day, a woman who was appealing herself as “just for you” (though I fully realize that probably isn’t literally true) received another highly rated ☆, and I couldn’t help laughing.
I’d been thinking that a deduction-based rating system—something like life points—might be better than an additive one. What kind of rating system do you all think would be best?
Of course, I’m sure some people will say that other people’s ratings don’t matter anyway…
I’m a huge fan of Mac-san, so I’d really appreciate a stylish answer.
I’m also an avid reader of Flag Maker-san’s columns, so if possible, I’d love an exciting answer.
As for Make-Otoko-san, I assume you can only give answers related to allowances, so please don’t overdo it—just give us your usual response.
👤Asked byGuest👨GenderMale🎂40s👑Universe male member
Even women with average ratings who are cute or beautiful probably receive plenty of offers, so I actually feel more comfortable with women who have higher ratings. Since I don’t want to end up with a person to avoid, I tend to make offers to women with good reviews.
If you’re looking for someone who doesn’t get many offers, why not turn that to your advantage and make an offer to a woman with an average rating who seems unlikely to receive many offers?
Fuu actually feels more at ease when a woman already has a papa. Since I’m fine with being a papa who aims to be second choice or lower, it doesn’t bother me. And if you want to efficiently meet a woman who’s cute, has a good personality, and is good in bed, the ones with higher ratings are your best bet.
I support the current rating system.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
As I’ve mentioned before, it’s possible to earn a five-star rating after just four dates.
So, in a way, I find the ratings useful, but in another way, I don’t think they’re entirely reliable.
For example, I might see a woman who seems appealing and inquire about her, only for the staff to tell me, “She’s had around ten dates.”
Even so, if I see that she has a rating of, say, three stars, it gives me a useful indication that she may not be particularly hospitable.
On the other hand, my current favorite—my “black-label” girl—was probably extremely popular before she started dating me.
When I asked the staff, they even said it was rare to find a woman who had been on so many dates without receiving a single negative review.
When I actually met her, though, she was somewhat businesslike and quite guarded at first. It took time before she truly opened up to me.
In conclusion, I’ve come to think that women with high ratings are probably the type who treat any man with a high level of hospitality, at least on the first date.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
So you’re suggesting a system where everyone starts with five stars, positive reviews don’t increase the rating beyond five, and negative reviews lower it to four, three, and so on.
If positive reviews were accumulated separately, then a few negative reviews wouldn’t reduce the star rating, and most women would have five stars.
I can see how that might suit men who want to avoid women who receive a lot of offers, but it also seems like it would remove the benefit of being able to confidently make offers to highly rated women, since they’re less likely to cancel at the last minute.
That said, I feel like most men don’t pay much attention to star ratings in the first place.
So it’s probably best not to worry about them.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
If you understand how the current rating system works, I think it can be useful as a rough reference.
With the current ratings, you can probably get a general idea of whether someone receives a lot of offers and how pleasant they are on a first meeting—but even as a reference, that’s about as far as it goes.
You can’t really tell whether you’re compatible with someone until you’ve met them a few times. The other day, I met a five-star woman, but she was so much like a papa-katsu cyborg that I got scared and went home.
Lately, I’ve been losing interest in papa-katsu girls, so maybe this whole hobby is coming to an end soon.
Once I write four more columns, I’ll have surpassed Kabukizaemon, so I think I’ll take a break there.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
So, questioner, you’re a Goonz, right? (I’ll play along for now♪)
I actually use this star system as a cue for ending things with a woman.
When her stars increase, I think, “She must have found a good papa. That’s great… Now I can end things with her.” Something like that.
In other words, I’m using it in a way that isn’t exactly helpful to women, I’m afraid m(_ _)m
So, as Maezawa-san has suggested for a while, I think profiles of women you’ve set up in the past should be automatically hidden, like they used to be.
And, so Universe can make some money, how about making it a perk for Black members: only Black members would continue to see the profiles unless the women specifically request otherwise? ← Please send requests to the branch office.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
I’m glad it’s a 4, since it would be a waste of time to end up with a woman who lacks the motivation and commitment.
That said, a 5 does make you wonder just how popular she really is.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
I don’t check the profiles of the people I meet, so it’s never really been a concern for me. I didn’t pay attention to them when making offers either. I used to look at them when I first joined, but I learned they weren’t reliable.
So, pretty much as you expected, my personal conclusion is: “I don’t really care.”
I have felt that someone was boring and that I’d wasted my time, but I’ve never run into a woman who was unpleasant to deal with.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
