It’s not about whether you’re worth 10 for an adult relationship (intimate). If my value were 3, then the value of you older men would be -7. I think a relationship starts with you first bringing your value up to zero. The allowance is compensation for putting up with it. Don’t you agree??

I’m Tetsu, a male member. That’s absolutely right. A papa should never forget that, at first glance, he’s seen as a terrible person.

The compensation is determined by the balance of supply and demand. Exactly—you’re absolutely right. Paper Airplane True papa-katsu (compensated dating in Japan) is finding someone who doesn’t make you feel like your allowance is “endurance money.” I hope you find someone you can genuinely enjoy spending time with.

I’m Dai, a male member. “​​If my value is 3, then the older guy’s value is −7” is an interesting way to look at it. It made me laugh. Personally, if negotiations over the allowance fall through, I think the important thing is to say goodbye gracefully, so neither of you ends up feeling bad.

I’m Kazu, a male member. I think each person is entitled to their own view of what an allowance represents. A person’s worth isn’t 10, 30, or 100. That’s absurd. The moment you start doing that kind of strange calculation, you’re already letting that old guy’s comments influence the way you think.

He may be annoying, but it’s better not to pursue a relationship that makes you put up with someone. Work on becoming even more amazing so you can command 10 without giving him anything to complain about—or choose only the best from among the many men interested in you. That way, you won’t have to put up with anything, and your stress level will be zero. Marika

Maezawa from the CEO’s office here, answering as well. I’m sorry. Did you happen to run into one of those male members who lectures women? They really are a problem. If a male member and a female member have different expectations regarding the allowance, he should simply walk away if they can’t agree. Please stop lecturing female members by demanding that they explain why their requested amount is supposedly unjustified. If a woman encounters someone like that, even if she later becomes intimate with him, I’d like her to make sure to leave a properly negative review. Since the ratings are averaged, if you give positive points for things like “he had a down-to-earth feel,” the overall rating won’t end up negative. As the saying goes, “If you hate the monk, you hate even his robes.” If you give negative ratings across the board, those reviews will accumulate, the man will receive a warning, and if the negative ratings continue to pile up, he’ll be forcibly expelled. There are many women who have been hurt. I’ve heard an incredible number of complaints. But many women think they should just put up with it themselves, which is the only reason these men haven’t been expelled. So please start by leaving a negative review. That said, the idea of rating the man at -7 is a good one. By that logic, the total would be 10, right? I think the questioner has a valid point. If the man says you’re a 3, it seems fair to say: “What exactly about me makes me worth sleeping with for a 3? Please explain properly.” But saying that would just bring you down to his level. If the conversation goes in that direction, I think it would be fine to end things by saying: “I have no obligation to explain myself to someone who doesn’t understand my worth. I’ve never accepted anything below a 10. That’s all there is to it. If that doesn’t work for you, please walk away. Shall we call it a day?” One thing to keep in mind: if you leave before he agrees that it’s okay, the club may receive a complaint saying that you left the date without permission. So you may need to confirm that it’s okay to leave.

You’re absolutely right. I agree 100%. That’s why, regardless of class or age, I give an allowance of 100,000 yen or more for an adult relationship (intimate). A papa who can’t give a woman 100,000 yen is either: 1. He doesn’t have the money. 2. He has money but is stingy. Papas who talk about giving 50,000 yen keep twisting their own logic to justify themselves, but I’m sure they know they fall into either category 1 or 2. The proof is that my answer probably struck a nerve with them.