Tips
Sep 3, 2019 18:30
This content is machine-translated.
(Whether the man will actually keep going along with it is a separate issue.)
“After we’ve met at least two or three times and gotten to know each other better” is such an obvious feeling for a woman that it hardly needs to be debated.
(Just like saying, “I’d prefer someone kind and clean,” or “Please make sure to use a condom”—it’s that basic.)
If women are given a deadline, wouldn’t they lose sight of why they chose Type B in the first place?
(The risk of it being misused for dinner-only scams is unavoidable. No one has come up with a fundamental solution yet.)
※
That said, I’d feel bad leaving this with no proposed solution, so here’s a mitigation idea from my limited perspective: During the woman’s interview, why not explain, “Men generally expect to go to a hotel on the second date. From the second date onward, if you meet him but ultimately decide you still aren’t ready and have to decline, it is considered etiquette at a dating club for the woman to waive the transportation reimbursement for that meeting”? This might provide a certain incentive while also acting as a deterrent.
3 answers
迷わない70代
Male
Send a reverse offer to this responder
パパ活歴11年目、回答者歴8年目の関西在住者。パパ活終活中(笑)
Age: 70 or older
👨 Male
Former Universe member
I’m a lost man in my 60s.
Please, no more “relaxation measures”!
I mainly make offers to women registered as Type B.
Why? Because it’s interesting to see how things unfold.
Of course, I sometimes take a hit. Even so, I learn from my mistakes and try again with someone else. That’s what makes this type so interesting, in my opinion.
We don’t need “relaxation measures” that drive women away from registering as Type B!
If you can’t become the kind of man who can win over a woman who’s neither Type A nor Type C, then what’s the point?
Other
I’m Saito, a columnist ♪
I agree with the questioner’s suggestion to ease the restrictions ♪
👨 Male
Universe member
I’m だて◎ゆめ, a male member.
I generally agree with the questioner’s “mitigation measures.”
In my case, I’d go a little further…
Taking the suggestion from the “Papa-Katsu Gentleman” into account, I’d cap the transportation allowance for the first meeting at ¥3,000. For Type B arrangements, I’d also split the offer fee into two payments, with half paid on the first date.
Then, from the second meeting onward, the woman would of course waive the transportation allowance—and since it’s no longer the first meeting, it might not even be called transportation money. How about splitting the meal bill as well?
This is just a personal suggestion.
The key point is that this proposal also asks female members to share some of the burden.
I think it’s a very good idea.(笑)