I joined recently as a Platinum-class member, which allows me to view women up to the Black class, so I’ve been browsing members nationwide.
This content is machine-translated.
Of course, everyone has different tastes, but there are occasionally some lovely women in the Standard class as well, and I currently have a few introductions being arranged.
That said, there are also some women in the Standard class whose appearance is clearly not on par—those rated only Level 1 or 2 by the interviewer. Since it seems unlikely that they would receive offers at the same introduction fee, would you consider creating an Economy class at half the Standard-class fee, and perhaps an additional Poor class at half the Economy-class fee?
👤Asked byGuest👨GenderMale🎂40s👑Universe male member
It’s something the club would need to consider comprehensively.
There seem to be all kinds of issues, so it would be difficult. Sorting people after interviews would also be a hassle for the club staff, and women who are labeled as “poor” would likely quit right away. There could even be rumors saying, “You shouldn’t join the club because they make such harsh selections.”
The whole system would need to be designed in a way that women support.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
I can’t agree with that.
If you’re being serious, your perspective seems pretty far off.
Women classified as “ecnomy” or “poor” would be hurt by that, wouldn’t they? The naming feels malicious.
When it comes to women who don’t even want to pay the standard introduction fee to meet, would you make an offer just because they’re classified as “ecnomy” or “poor”?
The classes aren’t rankings of the women themselves. They’re simply labels the club assigns to maximize introduction-fee revenue, based on a beauty-contest mindset and its business model.
In my case, I first look for women I actually want to meet without checking their class, and only look at the class when I’m deciding how much to pay.
I’m not so bored that I’ll meet someone just because she’s cheap, and I don’t want to make an offer to someone I’m barely interested in and end up being penny-wise and pound-foolish.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
I don’t see any need for classes like that.
Even if you divide them into more detailed categories, you’ll never get everyone to agree in the end.
Try putting yourself in the staff’s shoes.
Even now, male members like you are already saying things like, “Isn’t this woman actually not Standard?”—essentially making complaints that interfere with the staff’s work.
If the categories were split up even further, people would just start complaining, “Isn’t this woman not really Economy?” and create even more unnecessary work.
This may sound harsh, but I think it’s a completely unproductive proposal.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
