Thank you for sharing your valuable insight as a staff member.
This content is machine-translated.
Are you saying that truly good men don’t make their profiles public, and that the profiles of men who do are unreliable because the men write them themselves?
So that possibility does exist. If it hadn’t been made public, there would be no chance of that happening.
Normally, men don’t need to make it public. So if they do, there’s probably some intention behind it.
I didn’t plan to make mine public at first either, but once I no longer needed new offers, I started answering questions out of curiosity and occasionally made it public experimentally, just to see what would happen.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
As Kazu said, I honestly don’t understand what kind of mental gymnastics it takes to come to that conclusion.
You wrote the comment yourself, didn’t you? Are you lying?
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
This is Mr. Maezawa’s answer to that question:
> However, many genuinely good men keep their profiles private, and since much of the information written there is provided by the men themselves, it may be just as unreliable as information on dating apps.
It does not say, “Truly good men don’t make their profiles public,” or, “The profiles of men who do make them public can’t be trusted because the men wrote them themselves.”
Interpreting it that way suggests that the questioner’s head, personality, or both are the problem.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
