I used to think all the male respondents on the anonymous Q&A site were gentlemen, but I’ve heard that isn’t the case.
This content is machine-translated.
（Apparently, a female model acquaintance was victimized.）
Are the following things really considered ordinary and not particularly problematic?
① Having in-room dining in a hotel room from the very first meeting, without even getting the other person’s consent
② When she gently hints that she wants to decline an adult relationship (intimate), his attitude suddenly changes. It’s frightening.
It feels like she won’t be forgiven unless she says yes, as if she’s being coerced.
③ Insisting on his low initial offer (apparently, he eventually agreed to pay a little more, but reluctantly)
④ Suddenly using a toy without getting her consent
⑤ His private parts were so excessively altered that they were absolutely disgusting—enough to make her feel nauseated.
⑥ Just when she was relieved that it was finally over, he climbed on top of her again.
He ignored her when she said, “No, I don’t want to,” and it was practically rape. Does he really think unwanted play is fun?
He’s the only one who does. The woman genuinely hated it. And it happened three times…
⑦ Keeping her there for six hours
-----------------
⑧ When she contacted the club staff, they reportedly said, “That’s right. Even though he looks good, the reactions from women are terrible.”
They should have told her from the start.
Of course, I understand that Universe Club relies on male members who pay, so even if they have some problems, there are circumstances that make it difficult to cut off male members who receive a lot of offers.
By writing this much, I’m sure some respondents will realize that this is about them. I hope they deeply reflect on their actions.
To Mr. Maezawa,
If you decide that this submission isn’t a question but an attack, please delete it.
My objective will have been achieved if it simply catches the attention of the respondent in question.
I came across this because I found it amusing how many answers the daytime question got. It reeks of dishonesty, but in the end, you still caught a huge haul, didn’t you? Next time, you should introduce yourself as “Balsan” when asking a question. If you want to build a personal brand, you could add something like “in the top 1%” as a tagline. Out of respect, I’d like to call you “Bal-san.” If we get closer, I might start calling you “Balchi,” so I hope you’ll forgive me for that.
So this is about a female model acquaintance of yours. In other words, you’re a model too, despite being a man in your thirties? Is this female model acquaintance your girlfriend or maybe your younger sister? I honestly don’t understand what would motivate you to come here, angry and demanding serious self-reflection from her. I’ve also heard some pretty ruthless stories about the industry from a model I’m dating, so something about this feels off. The over-the-top nature of the story is obvious, but I wrote this because I also wanted to point out that the lack of any clear motive is suspicious.
I didn’t know people used the expression “the equipment is under construction.” I’d laugh if there were scaffolding and everything. Even if it went soft, it’d still be standing there the whole time. You’d definitely take a picture right then and post it immediately. It’d be way too photogenic（笑）
Ultimately, I think Maezawa-san’s opinion says it all. You couldn’t become a respondent unless you were someone with no negative ratings from women.
Sorry, I got sidetracked. We were talking about the equipment, right? As far as screening respondents goes, having it “under construction” isn’t a problem at all. Since it’s under construction, it would even be funny if the exterior had been removed and the inside were just an exposed framework. I’d like you to get him off by hand and record a video of the exact moment.
Even if the equipment were Ken Nakajima, I think that would still be acceptable. He may be getting older, but he still seems to move pretty well.
Also, since this might cause a misunderstanding, let me clarify: the respondents aren’t at each other’s throats. Maybe it only feels that way because Loser-kun is disliked（笑）. As for why I think he’s disliked, it’s because he dismisses other people’s ways of doing things. There are all kinds of preferences and ways of thinking in the world, right? Let’s respect different values.
Taro
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
Male respondents appear to undergo at least some form of screening.
If a staff member is saying, “He looks good, but women’s reactions to him are terrible,” then perhaps they’re talking about someone else entirely.
As Fuu mentioned in their answer, please have that model friend personally provide feedback to the club.
Also, if you’ve written it so that Maezawa-san will be informed as well, and the facts are checked and confirmed to be true, the respondent may have their eligibility revoked.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
There are so many things here that don’t add up.
Rather than relying on hearsay, the person involved should give the club feedback directly.
If this is true, the details need to be clarified and that papa should be banned from the club.
The woman should have gotten out as fast as possible at stages ①, ②, and ③. Does she have little experience with papa-katsu (compensated dating in Japan)?
Does a respondent like that even exist? Could they be impersonating another papa?
Please have the model herself—the friend in question—give the club feedback directly.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
Since you went to the trouble of asking, you might as well have included things like:
Age: young and energetic, or an old geezer
Height: tall or petite
Likely area of activity: urban or rural
Estimated annual income: high or low
You should’ve listed all sorts of things like that（笑）
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
The person answering may be making it up too—just to have something to talk about or to gain people’s trust.
Either way, that’s awful.
I’ve seen people who’ve had some work done a few times, but I’ve never seen anyone who’s had too much work done.
I feel that women should be warned about people with a history of cruel or terrible behavior. It already takes a lot of courage, and there are considerable risks involved... Meeting someone like this is just heartbreaking.
Akari
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
> I always thought the male respondents in the anonymous Q&A box were all gentlemen, but I heard that isn’t necessarily the case.
Basically, even the staff aren’t supposed to know who the respondents are. However, some people introduce themselves to the staff as being one of the respondents, and some may even tell women that they’re respondents.
We chose respondents who had never received a bad review from women, so I can’t say whether they’re gentlemen or not, but they aren’t bad people. I don’t think anyone who would do something like that is actually a respondent.
That said, someone might be taking advantage of the fact that the respondents’ identities are secret and falsely claiming, “I’m the person behind that respondent account.”
> Apparently, someone said, “That’s right. He looks good, but the reactions he gets from women are terrible.”
The staff don’t know who the respondents are either (except for those who reveal it themselves), so in this case, I think all the man was told was that he generally has a bad reputation. I don’t think the staff said anything about whether or not he was a respondent.
It’s possible that the staff misunderstood something after hearing it from a woman, but I don’t think he’s a respondent.
That said…
Someone who looks good?
Who could it be?
Everyone looks good, so that alone doesn’t narrow it down（笑）
> They should just tell women from the beginning.
I’ve mentioned this before, but even if we wrote something in the offer message like:
“Please be careful—this person is suspected of secretly filming people,”
with the intention that only women would understand the warning, the woman might say to the man when they meet:
“It said here that you’re suspected of secretly filming people. I was told to be careful.”
Then the man would say, “There’s no way I’d do something like that. What evidence do you have for writing that? Delete it immediately.”
And we’d end up having to remove it.
If we had evidence, we’d ban him outright. But if all we have is a woman saying, “I was secretly filmed,” there’s no proof, so we can’t forcefully ban him. All we can do is tell women individually. But once a woman tells the man, we can’t write it anymore ＞＜
If a woman finds a hidden camera, it would be great if she could photograph it with her phone. Or if she notices a phone placed somewhere suspicious, recording it on video would give us enough to ban him outright.
We can’t write about it, so we can’t tell women directly, but people with lots of bad reviews also have fewer stars, so they should be easy to spot.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
Some respondents operate while keeping their identity hidden, while others—including me—write their profiles so people can tell who they are.
But there are times when it becomes pretty difficult to do so.
Besides, if you’re going to do something unpleasant, you wouldn’t want to reveal your identity, right? (＞＜)
I’m curious who it is, but I probably shouldn’t ask…
What does “construction on one’s private parts” even mean?
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
You were scammed by a man who claimed to be one of the respondents.
For a second, I thought you were talking about Makeotoko, but he isn’t handsome（笑）
You were definitely scammed.
Or… are you staff at some dating club? Am I the only one who feels that’s more likely?
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
Do you have good looks?
I’m jealous… The best I ever get is “average,” “serious-looking,” or “seems kind”… Damn it… lol
I don’t even know whether what they wrote is true, but even before that, I’m annoyed that they don’t even need to make excuses… lol
And then—
Number ① is already weird. There’s no way that’s possible… What’s going on?
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
Would someone really do that and then identify themselves by saying, “I’m the person who answered your question, ○○”?!
Or is this about the person who received a reverse offer from the female questioner saying, “There’s no mistake—it was ○○ who answered my question”?
I think, for the most part, all the male answerers here are gentlemen. I can’t say that for certain since I’ve met more of them than not, though. I’ve never seen any of the male answerers’ private parts, either. If anything, I’m curious enough that I’d like to see this so-called “work” they’ve had done down there.
By answering questions here, we’re taking the risk that if we do something strange, people might call us out in the question box like this—or, at worst, even expose our names. I want to believe no one would do anything that terrible!!
Actually, what exactly was so terrible about it again?
Maybe it was the part about, “He looks good, but women’s reactions to him are awful.”
Other than that, they were indoors, and if the two of them agreed to it, that’s not really something outsiders can interfere with. She had apparently accepted the allowance terms, too.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
Would someone really keep doing things that are so blatantly unpleasant for women and then introduce himself as the respondent’s ○○○?
Well, I can believe men like that exist.
If I met him once and felt uncomfortable, I simply wouldn’t see him again.
I’d just forget about him and move on.
Update: But rereading it, wow.
When a handsome guy like this is also well-built and physically imposing, it really is scary.
A handsome, muscular, overconfident guy who thinks there’s no way he’d be turned down even if he offered a low allowance.
Surely he wouldn’t actually try to force anything in person, right?
That could really turn into rape.
Marika
Mr. Make-Do,
What do “NTR” and “NTR fetish” mean?
Oh, sorry. I thought they might have some other meaning too.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
Sticking stubbornly to a low offer, lol.
I’d heard through the grapevine that there’s an answerer with an NTR fetish, so I wonder if this might actually be the same person.
Hmm? No, probably not. Apparently the person with the NTR fetish kept throwing tons of money at it to make the NTR situation happen, and then got turned down, so it must be someone else. Does that mean there are two seriously messed-up answerers here…?
It’s scary, since the answerers can be fiercely at odds behind the scenes.
If it’s true that he’s good-looking, that should narrow it down pretty quickly.
As for me, my “thing” is handsome. I’m always complimented on it, after all. I wish people would compliment my face too (not happening).
P.S.
Tsubaki’s answer has me really curious. Be more specific! (Or is that something you can’t write here? lol)
P.P.S.
Tsubaki, if you have absolutely no connections with the other answerers, I’ll send you a Letter Date offer.
P.P.P.S.
Marika, it’s short for “netorare”—being cuckolded.
P.P.P.P.S.
Even if heaven and earth were turned upside down, there’s no way I could respect an allowance of 4. That would be so unfair to the woman.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
After reading your question, I can really sympathize with your fellow model. Being matched with someone like that is incredibly draining and exhausting, isn’t it?
That said, I’d like to offer one thought: regardless of how serious the situation was, I’m not sure it’s appropriate for a member to discuss such intimate matters with a third party—the person asking the question—while the man in question can still be identified.
Of course, I do think it’s absolutely necessary for her to report it to the staff herself…
Sorry for offering my unsolicited opinion. I imagine you were angry and posted this on her behalf, and perhaps you’re a kind person who really cares about your friend. Please do encourage and support your fellow model.
P.S.
He wasn’t a male member here, but I once met someone again after a long time and found out he’d had some work done down there, haha.
We ended things after arguing over something completely unrelated, though.
→ To Make-Otoko-san
I can’t exactly write about it here, and I wasn’t able to go on a date because I want to preserve everyone’s anonymity…
Hopefully we’ll have a chance to meet somewhere, sometime!
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
It’s not me either, lol.
I don’t know any male respondents whose manhood has had work done.
Since the question seems to be asking whether these are ordinary things that aren’t considered particularly problematic, I’ll answer.
> ① In-room dining in a hotel room from the very first meeting, without even getting the other person’s consent
Personally, I wouldn’t call that gentlemanly, but if he says it’s just a dinner date, it’s a difficult call.
If I were advising that woman from the modeling world, I’d suggest she clearly say at this stage, “I’m not really comfortable going to a hotel room right from the start.”
> ② When she gently hints that she wants to decline an adult relationship (intimate), his attitude changes completely. It’s scary.
Personally, I wouldn’t call that gentlemanly either, but since it’s a matter of impression, I don’t think it’s easy to classify as a problem.
> ③ He insists on offering his initially low amount (in the end, it seems she reluctantly agreed to a slightly higher amount)
The club doesn’t get involved in the allowance, so I don’t think this is a problem.
> ④ Suddenly using toys without getting her consent
Personally, I wouldn’t call that gentlemanly, but it’s something between the two of them, so I don’t think it’s a club-related problem.
> ⑤ His manhood has had so much work done that it’s incredibly gross—enough to make her feel nauseated.
That’s simply a matter of personal taste.
Personally, I often see women whose faces have had so much work done that they look incredibly gross.
> ⑥ Just when she’s relieved that it’s finally over, he climbs on top of her again.
Personally, I wouldn’t call that gentlemanly, but it’s something between the two of them, so I don’t think it’s a problem.
> ⑦ Keeping her there for six hours
If they’re both okay with that, then I suppose it’s fine.
追加 after reading Mac’s answer:
It might be some kind of body modification, such as splitting the head.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
