Is there really any need to distinguish between types C and D?

This is from the official Universe Club website: - Dating Type B2 【From the second meeting onward】 The first meeting is dinner only. There’s a possibility that the relationship may develop from the second meeting onward. - Dating Type C 【Depending on the chemistry】 If you hit it off, there’s a possibility that the relationship may develop from the very first day. - Dating Type D 【Proactive】 If you make a smooth invitation from the very first day, there’s a possibility that the relationship may develop. So, I’d say it’s pretty much as described above. If the papa side only wants intimacy, they can just go to an adult entertainment venue. But I’m not really interested in being with a woman who has been with lots of other men on the same day, or in anything tired, obligatory, and assembly-line-like. That doesn’t make my heart skip a beat, so I’d rather not go to those places. I’d prefer to be with a younger female student or office worker who’s a little closer to being a regular person. Fuu only makes offers to Type C and D women, because of the cost-effectiveness. If it’s dinner only, there are women who’ll go without needing any allowance. Personally, I think Type C is more popular than Type D because Type D feels almost the same as adult entertainment. Once you pay the allowance, it basically feels like she’s declaring that she’ll be intimate with almost anyone, and that’s a bit of a turnoff for the papa side. Looking at it from the woman’s perspective, I think Type C is good because even though she’s prepared for an adult relationship, being Type C gives her the option to say no if some absolutely disgusting old guy shows up. I think the difference between adult entertainment and papa-katsu is that women still have the right to choose. The person asking this question may simply be lucky enough not to have met someone they find physically repulsive. Still, to enjoy this club, the papas also need to understand that if they come across as creepy old men, they’ll be turned down. So compared with the papas on dating apps or out in the real world, the papas in the Universe Group are probably better—or at least on a higher level, haha. Let’s all work hard so that the papas in the Universe Group become men who are “good enough that, with a little financial support, women in their twenties would still be willing to be intimate with them”! I’m truly grateful to all the Type C women who are prepared for an adult relationship!

To you, “papa-katsu (compensated dating in Japan)” is basically the same as sex work, isn’t it? That’s type fraud, so you should switch to Type D right away. However, if it becomes widely known that Type C gets more offers than Type D, people classified as Type D would have nothing to lose by pretending to be Type C, so they’d all switch to Type C—and Type D would lose its meaning.

Just one thing. I can understand it from the questioner’s perspective. But “from a woman’s perspective”? Are you speaking for all women or something? Probably not.

From the wording, you seem to be almost certainly a Type D. It feels like you’re presenting yourself as Type C so you can receive more offers.

From a woman’s—especially a papa-katsu participant’s—perspective, I think sex can be described as “the act of spreading your legs and allowing someone to use your vagina.” As I mentioned in my answer to the previous question, a woman’s level of reluctance or willingness toward it is determined by factors such as her wariness, aversion to uncleanliness, whether she likes or dislikes the act itself, and her strategy. The resulting classifications are labeled A through D. Whether D is necessary or not is simply a matter of deciding whether there should be five levels or four, so honestly, either is fine. This is how someone with a scientific mindset might think about it, though someone with a humanities-oriented mindset may not find it satisfying. It’s difficult to describe numbers or degrees in words. For example, it’s pretty hard to explain the difference between 75 and 95 in writing, right? Just picture a scale from 0 to 100 in your head and decide, “It’s around here.” If it falls between 60 and 80, it’s C; if it’s between 80 and 100, it’s D. If we judge things in terms of whether they’re necessary, then this question itself is the clearest example of something unnecessary, because it’s almost identical to the previous question. I wondered whether the same person had posted it again because their previous question wasn’t getting answers displayed, but this one was posted after the previous one had already appeared.

You can tell the difference: C is a papa-katsu (compensated dating in Japan) pro—in other words, pretty ordinary—while D is an amateur with poor internet literacy. I actually prefer D. It’s better when they’re kept separate.

“From a woman’s perspective, C and D are the same.” I don’t think this is about a woman’s perspective—it’s about the questioner’s perspective. So, conversely, why do so many women choose C? If they were really the same, shouldn’t it be 50/50? Not everyone reads the question box, so why assume that just because you think they’re the same, other women think so too? One answer to the previous question said: “That’s because the questioner leans more toward C than D, so that’s how they feel.” To women who would be fine choosing D, C may look essentially the same. But to women who choose C, D doesn’t look equivalent. Considering that hardly any men actually see them as the same, the “I’m different” way of thinking isn’t particularly helpful here. It’s more accurate to say that women who properly consider how men see things—and can respond accordingly—will generally be valued more highly. I recommend thinking about how it looks from the man’s perspective.