I think other members and the club staff probably already know this, but Staff Member A’s comments on women’s profiles are somewhat distinctive compared with those written by other staff members.

This question is full of things to pick apart. Personally, since I’m anonymous, I feel a bit uncomfortable calling someone out by name. Why not just contact the club directly by email? And as for the 5 million yen a year—you don’t really need to go out of your way to mention the amount here, either. “Her motivation is high and the feedback has been good, but she doesn’t go on many dates. There’s no doubt she’s someone we’d like you to meet!” What exactly is so unique or problematic about that wording? It’s a commonly used phrase, and other staff members use it too. Isn’t this question just a woman who viewed her profile through a papa, taking a very targeted swipe at her out of frustration over not receiving many offers? That’s just Fuu’s speculation, though. Maybe she thinks she isn’t getting many offers because it says, “Her allowance is on the higher side.” The questioner probably just wrote it honestly because the amount you told the staff was higher compared with the other women. Isn’t that actually a good thing? Papa who offer low allowances get filtered out, so you won’t be bombarded with offers from low-paying papas and then have to turn them down all the time, haha.

I place a lot of importance on the staff comments, so I agree that they should be carefully reviewed. Ideally, they should also be checked internally before being posted!

If you want to share your opinion with the staff, please contact the club directly via LINE, email, or phone. If many other people feel the same way, or if this is causing the number of offers to decrease, they’ll make improvements. That said, looking at the content of your question, you wrote: “I’m disappointed that I’m apparently not what they’re looking for, so I leave the page and consider someone else.” So perhaps you’re saying that the women are listed as having high financial expectations. If that’s not actually the case and they’re being described that way anyway, then I do feel sorry for them. However, based on the current wording of your question, it’s impossible to tell. I really can’t determine which side is in the right. If you actually made offers to women like that and found that their allowance was lower than usual, or something similar, then I think your point is valid. But you should confirm those details before posting something like this. At this stage, if the women really are asking for unusually high amounts, then although it may reduce the number of offers, I feel it could be beneficial to men. (Even then, from the women’s perspective, they might be flexible once they actually meet someone, so I’m not sure whether content that discourages offers altogether is appropriate.) At Universe, the staff often tend to side with men—especially the female staff—so I do wish they would place more importance on the women as well. However, based on the content of this post—or rather, I’m not even sure it qualifies as a question—I can’t really say much. With the information provided, I feel it might be fine for this to be hidden. Please gather more evidence before posting. If women really are being inconvenienced by this, then thanks to you, some of them may end up being helped.