1.

That’s what the dating types are for, after all, so why not make offers to women in the B or A categories instead of deliberately approaching someone in category C? Alternatively, if the allowance is the same as it would be for an adult relationship (intimate), I think she’d be happy with that too...

In my case, at least, it wasn’t a problem to make the first meeting dinner only with someone who had a Type C dating profile. It’s best to let them know when making the offer that you’d prefer dinner only for the first meeting. There are also plenty of people who choose Type C but whose true preferences are actually closer to Type B.

> Is it better not to invite a Type C woman to anything beyond dinner if you applied to meet her? Both men and women have the right to decline, so you’re free not to invite her. However, if you don’t intend to reject her outright and simply want to end the first meeting after dinner, I think you should let her know through the staff before the date. > When applying, there’s a checkbox saying something like, “It’s dinner only, so please feel free to come.” If I check that when applying to a Type C woman, will she assume it’s dinner only? The woman should be shown that message, so she may well assume that day will be dinner only. Come to think of it, PATOLO also has relationship types for men. A Type B man—I don’t remember whether it was B1 or B2—went on a date with a Type C woman and tried to pursue an adult relationship (intimate) after dinner on the first day. The woman complained, saying something like, “Isn’t it relationship-type fraud to invite me on the first day when he’s Type B?” It was honestly amusing. When you put it that way, from the woman’s perspective, the man was committing relationship-type fraud. I assume the man set his relationship type carelessly, thinking of it the same way as at Universe, but honestly, men should stop committing relationship-type fraud too. There was also a man who made plans for a date but didn’t make an official offer for quite a while. When he finally did so shortly before the date, the woman replied, “I can’t make it anymore.” He then complained that canceling at the last minute was terrible. But really, because so many men had been abusing the official-offer system by making only verbal promises and never submitting the official offer, women probably stopped keeping their schedules open based on promises alone. That seems like a reasonable assumption. If you intend to go on a date, just make the offer right away. Well, it seems that men do strange things, women adapt accordingly, and then men who don’t know about that get caught up in the vicious cycle. PATOLO really is as chaotic as ever. Maybe some people find that fun, but I’m worried it may eventually become like an ordinary dating app, with things such as the other person not showing up at the meeting place, or a completely different woman showing up and saying, “That’s me”—meaning the photos only looked attractive because they had been heavily edited, and she’s actually an agent.

When I can’t secure four hours while coordinating schedules, I’ve occasionally made a “dinner only” offer from the start, even to women who are Type C. Also, even women who are currently receiving a lot of offers tend to have more availability during their periods, so “dinner only” offers are more likely to work out then. (I’ve even had women ask me, “Would dinner only be okay?”) Either way, as long as you clearly say “dinner only” and don’t make an offer that could be misunderstood, there’s nothing wrong with making a “dinner only” offer to a Type C woman. If you meet without telling her it’s “dinner only,” she’ll probably assume you intend to invite her further. That said, whether you invite her or not is entirely up to you. In my case, the woman I’ve continued seeing the longest is a Type C woman whose first meeting was dinner only. P.S. Are you perhaps asking about not inviting a Type C woman further—not just the first time, but ever? If you both agree, I think it’s perfectly fine to continue seeing each other for dinner only.

I think it’s good manners to make the invitation. If you meet a Type C woman and don’t ask her, she’ll probably feel rejected. That said, it’s a different story if you’re a filthy old guy, a low-paying old guy, or someone with no manners. She’ll probably think: “Wow, I’m so lucky he didn’t ask me♡” Some people deliberately offer a woman a low adult allowance so she’ll turn them down, but I’ve failed at that before. I told her, “My offer is 40,000 yen. That’s probably too low, right?” and she replied, “That’s fine!” I couldn’t back out, so we ended up going to a hotel. I felt bad offering only 40,000 yen, so I added more in the room.

It’s probably best to quit if you can. Normally, when it’s dinner only, either side may end up turning the other down. Women generally aren’t looking to have an adult relationship (intimate) on their first meeting. But once they’ve met, it’s natural for them to want to receive an allowance for intimacy—and, if possible, to see whether they’re compatible for continuing an adult relationship with a man who isn’t strange and might make a good ongoing partner. If an allowance is offered, women with a Type C arrangement have likely already resolved to move forward rather than turn down the man, unless he’s truly unacceptable. The man’s role is to offer more than the usual allowance for intimacy in response to those expectations. So I don’t think there’s necessarily any problem with giving the adult allowance, whether you end up going to a hotel or not. If the man also wants to convey that he likes her enough to continue seeing her, it’s natural for him to invite her to a hotel. That said, some women at these clubs are genuinely impressed when a man doesn’t invite them to have an adult relationship, even if they’re Type C. In those cases, continuing not to invite them can leave a lasting good impression. The allowance doesn’t need to be as much as the adult allowance, but it seems that a reasonably satisfying amount is still necessary.