Question for the guys who pay big: What kind of woman gets ¥250,000 per meeting? My maximum is ¥20,000 per meeting. Also, what exactly are these “loser guys”? LOL

I’m not the person you were hoping would answer, but: > What kind of woman asks for 250,000 yen per pay-per-meeting? Someone everyone knows, of course（笑） Try thinking through the possibilities yourself（笑） That’s right! That woman.

I don’t really have anything to add to the question, Mac, but pro wrestling and amateur wrestling are completely different sports. Wrestlers with an amateur wrestling background probably make up less than 30% of all professional wrestlers. I just didn’t want anyone reading this to get the wrong idea, haha. m(_ _)m Pro wrestling has a deep, unique appeal that only pro wrestling can offer. > So amateur wrestling is like genuinely pursuing someone without any money changing hands, while a dating club is like pro wrestling? That’s exactly how I see it! Sorry for chiming in with such a nitpicky correction even though I rarely comment, haha.

papa-katsu (compensated dating in Japan) is about giving each other some leeway, but under normal circumstances, unless there’s a genuine reason, neither men nor women really want to involve money between them. A woman with a high income has no need to receive an allowance, and a man who is popular and still in his prime has no need to pay one. Regardless of the pay-per-meeting amount, it’s something that only happens in a very limited part of society. Some men feel fulfilled by offering a high allowance, while others lose interest. Likewise, there are women who are swayed by money, and men who do or don’t like women who are. P.S. I was thinking about this again. “Loser” might actually be a pretty fitting name for Mr. Loser. From the perspective of the women receiving a high allowance—and the men paying it—they may be wonderful women. But from an ordinary woman’s perspective, they could also be seen as women who were swayed by money and lost. If the term refers not only to men who have lost, but also to women who lost out to money, then it has some real depth. > Mac True, there do seem to be aspects where people are conscious of winning and losing, or where they want to interpret things as being attacked. What’s impressive about Mr. Loser is that, even though men generally have no interest in hearing about men who pay high allowances, he still manages to make readers this interested, as with this question. His writing really has power.

“Loser Man” The meaning behind that name is simple: I’m still losing—over and over again. There are plenty of papas who offer more generous allowances than I do, and countless men who are far more successful than me in business. I don’t believe women are attracted to a man who’s stopped growing, so I keep asking myself: “You’re still losing badly. Work harder than you ever have.” A man who keeps losing—in short, a “Loser Man.” When I approach women in everyday settings, I lose nine times out of ten—even when I spend my money wisely. I hope to become a man who wins someday. As you pointed out, I’m the kind of person who can only survive on the battlefield. Even if I leave it temporarily, I start craving competition again. I only feel truly alive in that tense, razor-thin space between winning and losing. “Ah, I’m alive right now.” I don’t think a woman could be happy being with me. What I’m in love with is the tension of the battlefield. That’s also why I don’t give safe, inoffensive answers that are neither helpful nor harmful. I don’t think an answer that provokes no controversy is really an answer. I’m fully aware that I hurt a lot of people, but there are also people who support me passionately. That’s who I am. I don’t think, “If you hate me, just don’t read my answers.” Read them obsessively, get annoyed, and think, “Loser Man, just die.” That’s why I enjoy being dissed. Also, I used to be unbelievably poor. So I understand the hardships of poverty, and I’ve experienced firsthand that money can solve almost everything in this world. I hate the line, “There are things more important than money.” Anyone who can say that has never known poverty. For the record, the pay-per-meeting 250 guy is Kazu. My true pay-per-meeting maximum is 20. I only have one reasonably attractive woman on a monthly arrangement, so I guess I’m somewhere around medium-to-generous. The reason my allowance seems high—or rather, looks high—is that I only make offers to women who are very money-minded. They’re the kind of women who will immediately get up and leave if the pay-per-meeting amount is under 10. I can’t bid 5 for someone like that. I enjoy the process of courting women, which is why I make offers to Type A women. However, there are simply too few Type A women, and women I like rarely join, so Type B is my main playing field. If I really like someone, I’ll make an offer to a Type C as well. For the past three days, I’ve gone on dates with a Type A woman every day. My goal is to have a Type A woman ask me for an adult relationship (intimate). It would violate the rules for me to invite her myself. I also pursue women outside Universe, and lately I’ve been doing more of that than anything through Universe.