In the previous question, Kazu called the person asking the question “annoying.” Isn’t that a violation of the rules?
This content is machine-translated.
Application Guidelines
Please do not write anything untrue (except for details fictionalized to prevent people from being identified).
Please do not exaggerate.
Please do not praise the club (but feel free to praise the staff).
You may freely give harsh answers or criticism regarding the question itself, but criticizing the person asking the question is not allowed.
If you write about past experiences, please be considerate of everyone involved.
It says that criticizing the person asking the question is not allowed.
If someone has no intention of answering the question and simply says “annoying,” doesn’t that count as criticism?
👤Asked byGuest👩GenderFemale🎂20s👑Universe female member
Because it’s important to be liked by your papa.
If you annoy the people answering your questions—who are generally very tolerant, often extremely so—you’re going to have a problem.
That’s what we’re trying to get across with our answers.
It’s also important to take it as an opportunity to learn what you did wrong. Even when other people or your circumstances are at fault, looking for the cause within yourself can help you change things and make them work out.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
Condemnation means blaming someone for their mistakes or shortcomings.
If simply writing one word is enough to count as condemnation, then there have been plenty of past questions that could be considered defamatory toward answerers, and some of them haven’t even been hidden.
By any reasonable standard, they would qualify as defamation, so I assume there’s some judgment that things at this level are still perfectly acceptable for the answerers to deal with.
I wrote it as though it were someone else’s problem because there are also many things that I personally consider defamatory.
With that in mind, I don’t think this one qualifies as condemnation at all.
People should think carefully before posting in the question section.
Besides, this isn’t even a question related to papa-katsu (compensated dating in Japan), so it should be hidden anyway.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
It’s not so much that they’re annoying—I just don’t like people who are too persistent (´；ω；｀) Answerers are screened too, so I hope you get approved as well!
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
