I always enjoy reading the Q&A box.

Have you ever read Heidegger’s Being and Time? Heidegger’s descriptions are unique. For example, when explaining a cup, he might say that it looks round when viewed from above and rectangular from the side, endlessly chipping away at everything around it to express what a cup is. Of course, people have different relationship styles. Mac and I are simply chipping away at the edges of papa-katsu (compensated dating in Japan), much like Heidegger did. Date◎Yume, Flag Maker, Paper Airplane, Aya, Rin, and Ayase Nana are doing the same. On the other hand, if Mac and I shared the same opinion, would that really be useful as a reference? Since the majority is always bound to be wrong, the moment Mac and I agreed, we would become part of the majority and head in the direction of being “wrong.” That would benefit none of the readers looking at the Q&A. A thesis and an antithesis lead to aufheben (sublation), which gives rise to a synthesis. There is still plenty more to chip away at, and we haven’t yet expressed papa-katsu accurately. But shouldn’t the questioner simply follow the path they believe is right? Incidentally, whenever we meet, we do nothing but praise and affirm each other, so it would just become real-life boys’ love. We’re both adults, after all (^_^) Or do you like boys’ love? ♡ More importantly, I’ve offered to provide ¥300,000 in funding for Flag Maker’s intimate video project, so I’d love for them to use the money and make the project happen♪ P.S. Oh? Looks like it’s happening! Now Flag Maker has no choice but to accept the ¥300,000 from me, right? ♡ https://universe-club.jp/column/independent Ladies, please apply ↑↑↑! Take a look at the exchange between Flag Maker and me in the comments section of this article♪

If you’re both okay with it, I’ll put together a proposal and pitch it to Universal. I’m the type who genuinely enjoys being flattered.