Charming older guy, good conversationalist, pay-per-meeting 50,000 yen
This content is machine-translated.
Short, overweight, balding old man, socially awkward, pay-per-meeting 100,000 yen or more
What do you think the approval ratings would look like? I’m guessing around 80% for the former and 20% for the latter, but I’d love to hear everyone’s opinions.
Assuming the sex, availability, and other factors are the same, I’d probably choose a handsome older man who’s good at conversation.
I don’t think I could spend hours with someone who’s socially awkward.
If the sex is amazing, words aren’t necessary, so I’d keep him around.
Marika
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
It depends on the person.
As a man, even if a woman offered me 100 or 200 million yen, I absolutely couldn’t be intimate with someone I wasn’t attracted to.
On the other hand, there are women I’d want to be with so much that I’d be willing to give them tens of millions of yen—over time, I guess.
—Paper Airplane
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
I’m Aya, a female member.
You meet someone offering 10 per meeting two or three times, but it’s so painful that you gradually stop wanting to go on dates. Then you start thinking someone offering 5 per meeting might be better—but even if things are quickly wrapped up with the 5-per-meeting guy, you feel like he doesn’t really value you. And he probably has other girls besides you anyway, so it’s not even fun… I think 100% of women end up fading out of papa-katsu while feeling this way. We’re just being selfish.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
I’m Dai, a male member.
I think whether you urgently need money is also a major factor.
Once they have a bit more financial breathing room, more women may choose a ¥50,000 pay-per-meeting arrangement.
I’ve heard that popular women who have been registered for a while may even turn down ¥100,000 per meeting, depending on the person.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
I’m in Seattle.
This is an interesting question.
I’d love to hear from the female respondents.
I wonder if there are many women who do it purely for the money. Maybe around 20% are working hard with the latter goal of saving up.
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
A papa (a male supporter) with a low allowance isn’t an “ikeoji” (stylish older man), no matter how good-looking he is.
You’re called an ikeoji because you’re attractive, gentlemanly, and your allowance is good too.
So the former is a “half-ike.”
I wouldn’t go so far as to call them “anti-ike,” but since a fair number of them are looking for something for free, there’s only a fine line between half-ike and anti-ike.
—A loser guy
(3 replies left)
(3 replies left)
💡 This question has no password registered, so the reply feature is unavailable.
If you access from the device/browser used to post the question, you may be able to set a password later.
